Maarg Manthan · Topic 29.3

Education Under Company Rule: Charter Act of 1813 to Macaulay’s Minute

Modern History › Press, Education, Peasants and Workers · Topic 29.3

For its first 60 years of rule the Company took no interest in education beyond a few oriental institutions. The Charter Act of 1813 directed it to set aside one lakh rupees a year, which was released only in 1823 after a dispute. The Orientalist-Anglicist controversy was settled by Macaulay's Minute of 1835 in favour of English-medium teaching of Western science and literature, based on the downward filtration theory.

Share:
Education Under Company Rule: Charter Act of 1813 to Macaulay’s Minute - Modern History - MaargX UPSC Maarg Manthan

At a Glance

  • Early colleges Calcutta Madrasah 1781; Benaras Sanskrit College 1791
  • 1813 One lakh rupees a year for education
  • Macaulay’s Minute 1835; English medium for Western learning
  • Theory Downward filtration
  • Exam link UPSC Prelims, Modern History: Press, Education, Peasants and Workers

Where Does It Fit?

This is the third topic of the category on the press, education, peasants and workers. The previous topic covered the Vernacular Press Act and later press laws. This topic covers education under Company rule up to Macaulay’s Minute. The next topic covers Wood’s Despatch of 1854. Previous topic: Vernacular Press Act, 1878 and Later Press Laws.

What Did the Company Do for Education at First?

For the first 60 years of its dominion in India, the East India Company, a trading and profit-making concern, took no interest in promoting education. There were some minor exceptions from individual efforts.

Institution Details
Calcutta Madrasah Established by Warren Hastings in 1781 for the study of Muslim law and related subjects
Sanskrit College, Benaras Established by Jonathan Duncan, the Resident, in 1791 for Hindu law and philosophy
Fort William College Set up by Wellesley in 1800 to train Company civil servants in the languages and customs of Indians, closed in 1802

The Madrasah and the Sanskrit College were meant to give a regular supply of qualified Indians to help administer law in the Company’s courts, and knowledge of classical and vernacular languages was useful in correspondence with Indian states. Enlightened Indians and missionaries began to press the government to promote modern, secular, Western education, seen as the remedy for the country’s social, economic and political ills. The missionaries thought modern education would destroy Indians’ faith in their religions and lead them to Christianity, and the Serampore missionaries were especially keen on spreading education. The missionaries’ role is in Charter Act of 1813 Allies Radicals, Imperialists and business Reformers Rammohan Roy, Vidyasagar, Malabari…">Role of Christian Missionaries and the Indian Renaissance.

What Did the Charter Act of 1813 Provide?

The Charter Act of 1813 adopted the principle of encouraging learned Indians and promoting knowledge of the modern sciences in the country, and directed the Company to sanction one lakh rupees a year for this. Even this small sum was not made available until 1823, mainly because of a controversy over the direction the spending should take. Meanwhile the efforts of enlightened Indians such as Raja Rammohan Roy bore fruit: a grant was sanctioned for the Calcutta College, set up in 1817 by educated Bengalis to give English education in Western humanities and sciences, and the government set up three Sanskrit colleges at Calcutta, Delhi and Agra. The Act is in Pitt’s India Act: Board of Control 1793 to…">Constitutional Development 1773-1858: Regulating Act to the Act of 1858.

What Was the Orientalist-Anglicist Controversy?

Within the General Committee on Public Instruction, the Anglicists argued that government spending on education should be exclusively on modern studies. The Orientalists said that while Western sciences and literature should be taught to prepare students for jobs, emphasis should be placed on expanding traditional Indian learning. Even the Anglicists were divided on the medium: one faction favoured English, the other the Indian languages, the vernaculars. There was great confusion over English and the vernaculars as media of instruction and as subjects of study.

What Did Macaulay’s Minute Decide?

Lord Macaulay’s Minute of 1835 settled the dispute in favour of the Anglicists: limited government resources were to go to teaching Western sciences and literature through the English language alone. Macaulay held that Indian learning was inferior to European learning, which was true so far as the physical and social sciences of the time were concerned. The government soon made English the medium of instruction in its schools and colleges and opened a few English schools and colleges, instead of a large number of elementary schools, thus neglecting mass education.

The British planned to educate a small section of the upper and middle classes, creating a class Indian in blood and colour but English in tastes, opinions, morals and intellect, who would act as interpreters between the government and the masses and would enrich the vernaculars, through which knowledge of Western science and literature would reach the masses. This was called the downward filtration theory. Modern ideas, if not education, did filter down to the masses, though not in the way the rulers wished, through political parties, the press, pamphlets and public platforms. Modern education only helped by making basic literature on the physical and social sciences available to nationalists and so strengthening their capacity for social analysis, though the content, structure and curricula of modern education served colonial interests. The press is in Development of the Indian Press: Early Regulations and the Struggle for Freedom.

What Were Thomson’s Efforts?

James Thomson, Lieutenant-Governor of the North-Western Provinces from 1843 to 1853, developed a comprehensive scheme of village education through the vernaculars. In these village schools, useful subjects such as mensuration and agricultural science were taught. The purpose was to train staff for the newly created Revenue and Public Works Departments. As an analytical point, Macaulay’s decision and Thomson’s scheme show the two directions open to the Company: a narrow English education for a small class that would help administer the country, or a wider vernacular education that would serve the village, and the first won, with the consequence that literacy remained low and the divide between the educated few and the masses grew. The Despatch that tried to correct this is in Wood’s Despatch, 1854.

Why Is This Topic Important?

  • Macaulay’s Minute A stock Prelims and Mains topic
  • Downward filtration A defined theory
  • Charter Act of 1813 grant The first state commitment to education

What Came Next?

The next topic covers Wood’s Despatch of 1854. Next topic: Wood’s Despatch, 1854.

Key People and Terms

  • Orientalists Supporters of traditional Indian learning
  • Anglicists Supporters of Western studies in English
  • Macaulay’s Minute The 1835 decision for English education
  • Downward filtration theory Educating a few to pass knowledge down to the masses
  • General Committee on Public Instruction The body in which the controversy took place
  • Serampore missionaries Missionaries keen on spreading education

Exam Corner

Points to Remember

  • Calcutta Madrasah 1781; Sanskrit College 1791; Fort William 1800.
  • Charter Act 1813: one lakh rupees; released in 1823.
  • Calcutta College 1817 by educated Bengalis.
  • Macaulay’s Minute 1835: English alone.
  • Thomson: village vernacular schools in the NWP.

Do Not Confuse With

  • Orientalists and Anglicists Traditional learning versus Western studies
  • Calcutta Madrasah and Calcutta College 1781 oriental school versus 1817 English college
  • Downward filtration and mass education A small class taught, the rest left

Memory Hook

One lakh in 1813, paid in 1823, and in 1835 Macaulay chose English.

Mains Angle

Questions ask about early education policy and Macaulay’s Minute. These points add depth.

  • Oriental institutions Law and administration
  • Controversy Orientalists and Anglicists
  • Result English medium and filtration

A Question You May Face

An original practice question, not a past paper question.

“Discuss the education policy of the East India Company up to Macaulay’s Minute and its consequences.”

How to Answer

  1. Beginning Oriental colleges and the 1813 grant.
  2. Controversy Orientalists and Anglicists.
  3. Minute English and filtration.
  4. Conclude Neglect of mass education.

GS Relevance

Prelims: Modern Indian History, Macaulay's Minute and the Orientalist-Anglicist controversy. GS Paper 1: Modern Indian history, education policy under the Company.

Frequently Asked Questions

What did the Charter Act of 1813 provide for education?

It adopted the principle of encouraging learned Indians and promoting modern science, and directed the Company to sanction one lakh rupees a year for the purpose. The sum was not actually made available until 1823 because of controversy about how it should be spent.

What was the Orientalist-Anglicist controversy?

The Anglicists in the General Committee on Public Instruction wanted government money spent only on modern studies, while the Orientalists wanted traditional Indian learning expanded alongside Western sciences. There was also a division over whether the medium should be English or the vernaculars.

What did Macaulay's Minute of 1835 decide?

It decided in favour of the Anglicists that limited government funds should go to teaching Western sciences and literature through English alone, based on the view that Indian learning was inferior to European learning in the physical and social sciences.

What was the downward filtration theory?

It was the British plan to educate a small upper and middle class, Indian in blood and colour but English in tastes and opinions, who would act as interpreters between the government and the masses and would carry Western knowledge down to the people through the vernaculars.

What was the effect of Macaulay's policy on mass education?

The government made English the medium of instruction and opened a few English schools and colleges instead of many elementary schools, so mass education was neglected and a gulf grew between the English-educated few and the masses.

PYQ Practice — Statement Analysis

1 The Charter Act of 1813 directed the Company to spend one lakh rupees a year on education.
True

The money was not released until 1823.

2 Macaulay's Minute settled the controversy in favour of the Orientalists.
False

It favoured the Anglicists.

3 The Calcutta Madrasah was established by Warren Hastings in 1781.
True

It taught Muslim law.

4 The downward filtration theory aimed at educating the masses first.
False

It aimed to educate a small class whose knowledge would filter down.

5 James Thomson developed a scheme of vernacular village education in the North-Western Provinces.
True

He served there as Lieutenant-Governor.

Share: