Decline of the Indus Civilisation
Ancient History › Indus Valley Civilisation · Topic 3.10
The urban Harappan culture declined from about 1900 BC: Harappa and Mohenjo-daro were gone by then, while degenerate forms lasted in Gujarat, Rajasthan, Haryana and western UP to about 1500 BC. Suggested causes include rivers shifting away from the Sarasvati about 1700 BC, falling rainfall, floods at Mohenjo-daro, the break in trade with Mesopotamia after Elam's rise (about 2000 BC), soil exhaustion and weakening elite control, not a single cause.
5 min read · UPSC Prelims · History · Indus Valley Civilisation
At a Glance
- Date Urban phase ends about 1900 BC
- Fringe survival To about 1500 BC
- River change Yamuna and Sutlej leave the Sarasvati about 1700 BC
- Trade break Elam powerful about 2000 BC
- Verdict Multiple causes
- Exam link UPSC Prelims, Ancient History: Indus Valley Civilisation
Where Does It Fit?
This is the tenth topic of the category on the Indus Valley Civilisation. The previous topic covered Harappan art, and this one covers the end of the urban culture. The next and last topic of the category covers the post-Harappan phase and the problem of continuity. Previous topic: Harappan Pottery, Images, Terracotta Figurines and Stone Work.
When Did the Culture End?
In short: the great cities disappeared about 1900 BC, while the culture faded away slowly at the edges.
The mature Harappan culture existed broadly between 2500 and 1900 BC, and in this period it seems to have kept the same tools, weapons and houses, with the same town planning, seals, terracottas and long chert blades. The view of changelessness should not be pushed too far, as changes are seen in the pottery of Mohenjo-daro over time. By the nineteenth century BC the two important cities, Harappa and Mohenjo-daro, had disappeared, but the Harappan culture at other sites faded out gradually and continued in a degenerate form on the outlying fringes of Gujarat, Rajasthan, Haryana and western UP until 1500 BC. Another account dates the decline from about 1900 BCE.
What Causes Have Been Suggested?
| Cause | Argument |
|---|---|
| River changes | Around 1700 BC both the Yamuna and the Sutlej moved away from the Sarasvati or Hakra, so the water supply was lost; shifting river courses are also cited by other historians |
| Climate | Rainfall decreased at about that time; continuous drought and drying of resources are suggested |
| Floods | Some speak of dam formation on the Indus causing massive flooding at Mohenjo-daro; floods are also cited |
| Trade collapse | Elam emerged as a powerful state around 2000 BC and interrupted the supply of Harappan goods to Mesopotamia and of Mesopotamian imports, including tin; the end of beads exports left craftsmen jobless and the break in tin supply hurt bronze smiths |
| Soil exhaustion | Exhaustion of the soil may have reduced cereal production and starved the urban people |
| Loss of control | Once the aristocracy living in the cities failed to exercise control over crafts and cultivation, the culture collapsed |
| Invasions | Suggested by some, but see the discussion of new peoples in Post-Harappan Cultures and the Problem of Continuity |
How Did the Culture Change on the Ground?
| Feature | Mature phase | After decline |
|---|---|---|
| Towns | Planned cities with citadel and lower town | Disappeared; villages |
| Writing | Seals with the script | Not found |
| Bricks | Standard burnt bricks | Not used for centuries |
| Metal | Bronze tools | Copper and stone |
| Pottery | Red ware with black designs | Simpler designs |
| Weights | Standard cubical weights | Absent in later phase |
The contrast shows that the collapse was a disappearance of an urban way of life, not of all people: village communities continued in many areas and kept some skills, such as the potter’s wheel.
What Do Historians Conclude?
It is difficult to account for the cultural collapse. The environmental factor may have been important, but failure in human activities cannot be discounted. The Harappan economy depended on long-distance trade for raw materials and on flood-plain farming for surplus, so both could be hit by changes in rivers and rainfall. People shifted to the southern and eastern directions from the Indus region in the course of time, according to another account. The urban features disappeared: systematic town planning, extensive brickwork, writing, standard weights and measures, the citadel and lower town distinction, bronze tools and painted red ware. As an analytical point, the explanation that best fits the evidence is a combination in which a loss of water and rain weakened farming, a break in foreign trade ruined crafts, and an elite unable to manage either lost control. The post-urban phase is described in Post-Harappan Cultures and the Problem of Continuity, the river changes in Ecology and Environment in Ancient India, and the trade in Trade and Commerce of the Harappan Civilisation.
Why Is This Topic Important?
- Debated topic Multi-cause questions appear in Mains
- Rivers and trade Environmental and economic explanations
- Link Prepares continuity and Vedic questions
What Came Next?
The next topic describes the post-Harappan cultures and the problem of continuity. Next topic: Post-Harappan Cultures and the Problem of Continuity.
Key People and Terms
- Sarasvati River identified with Ghaggar-Hakra
- Elam State in south-west Iran
- De-urbanisation Decline of towns
- Post-urban Harappan Late phase after the cities
- Hakra Dried river in Sindh and Cholistan
- Inundation Flooding
Exam Corner
Points to Remember
- Cities gone by 1900 BC; fringes to 1500 BC.
- Yamuna and Sutlej left the Sarasvati about 1700 BC.
- Elam rose about 2000 BC.
- Trade break hurt bead and bronze workers.
- No single cause.
Do Not Confuse With
- Urban and post-urban phase Cities and writing versus villages
- Mohenjo-daro floods and Sarasvati shift Local flooding versus regional river change
- Elam and Mesopotamia Intermediary state versus final market
Memory Hook
Rivers wander, rain thins, Elam blocks trade, soil tires, rulers lose grip: the cities fade.
Mains Angle
Questions on decline ask for a balanced multi-cause answer. These points add depth.
- Environment Rivers and rainfall
- Economy Trade collapse and soil
- Politics Loss of elite control
A Question You May Face
An original practice question, not a past paper question.
“Discuss the causes of the decline of the Indus Valley Civilisation.”
How to Answer
- Date About 1900 BC.
- Nature River shifts and rainfall.
- Economy Trade and soil.
- Verdict Combined causes.
GS Relevance
Frequently Asked Questions
When did the Indus civilisation decline?
The mature Harappan culture existed between 2500 and 1900 BC. By the nineteenth century BC the cities of Harappa and Mohenjo-daro had disappeared, although a degenerate form of the culture survived at the fringes until about 1500 BC.
How did river changes cause the decline?
Around 1700 BC the Yamuna and Sutlej moved away from the Sarasvati or Hakra, which meant a loss of water supply for the Harappan zone. Rainfall also decreased at about that time, weakening farming settlements.
How did trade affect the decline?
The emergence of Elam as a powerful state around 2000 BC interrupted the supply of Harappan goods to Mesopotamia and of imports like tin to the Indus. Bead makers lost their livelihood and bronze smiths lost their metal supply.
Did floods destroy Mohenjo-daro?
Some scholars speak of dam formation on the Indus that led to massive flooding of Mohenjo-daro, and a large part of the city was destroyed by floods. Floods are one of several suggested causes, not a full explanation.
Was there a single cause of the Harappan decline?
No. Historians point to several factors: shifting rivers, falling rainfall, floods, break in trade, soil exhaustion and failure of the urban elite to control crafts and cultivation. Failure in human activities cannot be discounted either.
PYQ Practice — Statement Analysis
1 The Yamuna and Sutlej moved away from the Sarasvati about 1700 BC.
This meant a loss of water.
2 The rise of Elam helped Harappan trade with Mesopotamia.
It interrupted the trade.
3 Harappa and Mohenjo-daro had disappeared by the nineteenth century BC.
Degenerate culture survived on the fringes.
4 A single cause fully explains the decline.
Several causes are suggested.
Related Topics
Browse the full Ancient History index