Maarg Manthan · Topic 14.2

Partition of Bengal, 1905

Modern History › Era of Militant Nationalism, 1905-1909 · Topic 14.2

The partition of Bengal, made public in December 1903 and announced in July 1905, divided the province into Bengal (with Bihar and Orissa, capital Calcutta) and Eastern Bengal and Assam (capital Dacca). The stated reason was administrative size, but the real motive was seen as weakening Bengal, the nerve centre of nationalism, by dividing Bengalis on language and religion.

Share:
Partition of Bengal, 1905 - Modern History - MaargX UPSC Maarg Manthan

At a Glance

  • What it is The division of Bengal Presidency in 1905 under Curzon
  • Announced Decision public December 1903; announced July 1905; effective 16 October 1905
  • New provinces Bengal (with Bihar and Orissa), and Eastern Bengal and Assam
  • Real motive Weaken Bengal, the nerve centre of Indian nationalism
  • Exam link UPSC Prelims, Modern History: Era of Militant Nationalism, 1905-1909

Where Does It Fit?

This is the second topic of the category on the era of militant nationalism. The previous topic gave the causes of the militant trend. This topic describes the partition that triggered mass action. The next topic covers the anti-partition campaign under the Moderates. Previous topic: Why Militant Nationalism Grew.

What Was the Partition Plan?

The British government’s decision to partition Bengal was made public in December 1903. The idea was to have two provinces: Bengal, comprising Western Bengal along with the provinces of Bihar and Orissa, and Eastern Bengal and Assam. Bengal retained Calcutta as its capital, while Dacca became the capital of Eastern Bengal.

Province Composition Capital
Bengal Western Bengal with Bihar and Orissa Calcutta
Eastern Bengal and Assam Eastern Bengal and Assam Dacca

What Was the Official Reason?

The official reason given was that Bengal, with a population of 78 million, about a quarter of the population of British India, had become too big to be administered. It was also said that the partition would help in the development of Assam if it came under the direct jurisdiction of the government. This was true to some extent.

What Was the Real Motive?

But the real motive behind the partition plan was seen to be the British desire to weaken Bengal, the nerve centre of Indian nationalism. This it sought to achieve by putting the Bengalis under two administrations, dividing them in two ways:

Basis Effect
Language Bengalis became a minority in Bengal itself: Bengal proper was to have 17 million Bengalis and 37 million Hindi and Oriya speakers
Religion The western half was to be Hindu-majority (42 million out of 54 million) and the eastern half Muslim-majority (18 million out of 31 million)

Risley, the home secretary to the Government of India, wrote in 1904 that a united Bengal was a power and a divided Bengal would pull in different directions, and that one of the main objects was to split up and thereby weaken a solid body of opponents to British rule.

Trying to win over the Muslims, Curzon, then the viceroy, argued that Dacca could become the capital of the new Muslim-majority province, which would give Muslims a unity not experienced by them since the days of old Muslim viceroys and kings. It was clear that the government was up to its old policy of propping up Muslim communalists to counter the Congress and the national movement. The Muslim response and the founding of the Muslim League are told in Morley-Minto Reforms, 1909, and the Formation of the Muslim League.

How Did the Partition Fit Curzon’s Policies?

The partition is listed among Curzon’s measures that left no doubt about the reactionary nature of British rule, along with the Official Secrets Act, the Indian Universities Act and the Calcutta Corporation Act, as told in Why Militant Nationalism Grew. As an analytical point, the partition combined two aims: an administrative claim that could be defended openly, and a political aim that Risley’s note put in plain words. That mismatch between the stated and real reasons is why Indians of all groups opposed it and why the argument about motive is still a standard question.

The first response was a campaign of petitions led by the Moderates, described in Anti-Partition Campaign Under the Moderates, followed by the swadeshi and boycott movement, described in Swadeshi and Boycott Movement Under Extremist Leadership.

Why Is This Topic Important?

  • Core event The partition of Bengal and its motive are asked in Prelims and Mains
  • Statistics Provinces, capitals and population figures are tested
  • Origin of Swadeshi The partition triggered the swadeshi movement

What Came Next?

The next topic covers the anti-partition campaign under the Moderates. Next topic: Anti-Partition Campaign Under the Moderates.

Key People and Terms

  • Partition of Bengal The 1905 division of Bengal Presidency into two provinces
  • Eastern Bengal and Assam The new Muslim-majority province with Dacca as capital
  • Risley The home secretary who wrote that a divided Bengal would weaken opponents
  • Nerve centre The centre of Indian nationalism, in the British view, Bengal
  • Communalists People who promote the separate interests of a religious community in politics
  • Division by language The splitting of Bengalis from Hindi and Oriya speakers

Exam Corner

Points to Remember

  • Decision public December 1903; announced July 1905; in force 16 October 1905.
  • New provinces: Bengal (Calcutta) and Eastern Bengal and Assam (Dacca).
  • Bengal population 78 million; Bengalis only 17 million of the new Bengal.
  • Risley, 1904: split and weaken a solid body of opponents.
  • Curzon appealed to Muslims with Dacca as a capital.

Do Not Confuse With

  • Announcement and enforcement Announced July 1905; in force 16 October 1905
  • Official reason and real motive Size and Assam’s development versus weakening nationalism
  • Eastern and Western Bengal East: Muslim-majority, Dacca; West: Hindu-majority with Bihar and Orissa, Calcutta

Memory Hook

Size was the excuse; division was the aim.

Mains Angle

Questions ask for the motive and impact of the partition. These points add depth.

  • Divide by language Bengalis reduced to a minority in their own province
  • Divide by religion A Hindu-majority west and a Muslim-majority east
  • Appeal to Muslims Curzon’s argument about Dacca

A Question You May Face

An original practice question, not a past paper question.

“Examine the motives behind the partition of Bengal in 1905.”

How to Answer

  1. Plan Provinces and capitals.
  2. Official reason Size and Assam.
  3. Real motive Language, religion, Risley’s note.
  4. Conclude Link to the response.

GS Relevance

Prelims: Modern Indian History, partition of Bengal. GS Paper 1: Modern Indian history, causes and motive of the partition of Bengal, 1905.

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the partition of Bengal in 1905?

The partition of Bengal divided the province into Bengal, with Western Bengal, Bihar and Orissa and the capital Calcutta, and Eastern Bengal and Assam, with the capital Dacca. It was made public in 1903 and announced in July 1905.

What was the official reason for the partition of Bengal?

The official reason was that Bengal, with 78 million people, a quarter of British India, was too big to administer, and that Assam would develop better under direct government jurisdiction. This was partly true, but it was not the real reason.

What was the real motive behind the partition of Bengal?

The real motive was to weaken Bengal, the nerve centre of Indian nationalism, by dividing Bengalis by language, making them a minority in Bengal, and by religion, creating a Hindu-majority west and a Muslim-majority east.

What did Risley say about the partition of Bengal?

Risley, home secretary to the Government of India, wrote in 1904 that a united Bengal was a power and a divided Bengal would pull in different directions, and that one aim was to split and weaken a solid body of opponents.

How did Curzon try to win Muslim support for the partition?

Curzon argued that Dacca could be the capital of the new Muslim-majority province, which would give Muslims a unity they had not had since the days of old Muslim viceroys and kings, in line with the policy of countering the Congress.

What population figures were cited for the partition?

Bengal had 78 million people, and the new Bengal was to have 17 million Bengalis and 37 million Hindi and Oriya speakers. The west would have 42 million Hindus of 54 million, and the east 18 million Muslims of 31 million.

PYQ Practice — Statement Analysis

1 The partition of Bengal came into force on 16 October 1905.
True

It was announced in July 1905.

2 Eastern Bengal and Assam had Calcutta as its capital.
False

Its capital was Dacca; Bengal kept Calcutta.

3 Risley's note said the partition would split and weaken opponents of British rule.
True

He was home secretary in 1904.

4 The partition made Bengali speakers a majority in the new Bengal province.
False

They became a minority, with 17 million Bengalis and 37 million Hindi and Oriya speakers.

5 Curzon was the Viceroy when the partition was carried out.
True

He argued that Dacca could be a Muslim capital.

Share: