Sayyid Dynasty
Medieval History › The Delhi Sultanate · Topic 2.5
The Sayyid dynasty ruled the Delhi Sultanate from 1414 to 1451. Khizr Khan, Timur's deputy at Multan, took Delhi in 1414 and acknowledged Timur's line, his successors ruled a shrunken territory around Delhi, and Alam Shah gave up the throne to Bahlul Lodi in 1451.
5 min read · UPSC Prelims · History · The Delhi Sultanate
At a Glance
- Period 1414 to 1451
- Founder Khizr Khan
- Number of rulers Four
- Status Fourth dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate
- Successor Lodi dynasty under Bahlul Lodi
- Exam link UPSC Prelims, Medieval History: The Delhi Sultanate
Where Does It Fit?
This is the fifth topic of the category on the Delhi Sultanate. The previous topic traced the breakup of the Sultanate into provincial kingdoms, and this topic covers the short dynasty that held Delhi in the fifteenth century. The next topic covers the Lodis, who ended it. Previous topic: Provincial Kingdoms and Resistance by Indian Chiefs Against the Sultanate.
How Did the Sayyids Come to Power?
In short: the Sayyid dynasty arose after Timur’s invasion of 1398, when Khizr Khan, whom Timur had made deputy at Multan, took Delhi on 28 May 1414.
After Timur’s sack of Delhi, the Tughlaq line lingered and the Sultanate shrank to a small area around the capital. Khizr Khan took Delhi in 1414, but he did not take the title of sultan and nominally acknowledged the suzerainty of the Timurids. Modern historians doubt the family’s claim to descent from the Prophet and think they may have been of Arab or Punjabi Khokhar origin.
Who Were the Four Sayyid Rulers?
| Ruler | Reign | Main fact |
|---|---|---|
| Khizr Khan | 1414 to 1421 | Deputy of Timur at Multan; took Delhi; did not take the title sultan |
| Mubarak Shah | 1421 to 1434 | Dropped Timurid allegiance, took the title shah and professed allegiance to the caliph; defeated Hoshang Shah of Malwa, who paid heavy tribute |
| Muhammad Shah | About 1434 to 1443 | Came to power with the help of the vizier Sarwar ul-Mulk; faced many rebellions; Multan became independent under the Langahs |
| Alam Shah | 1443 to 1451 | Weak ruler who left power to his minister Hamid Khan; gave Bahlul Lodi the governorship of Sirhind; abdicated on 19 April 1451 |
The sources give different end dates for Muhammad Shah, so exam answers should stay with the year 1443 to 1445 range or the century.
Why Did the Sayyid Dynasty Fail?
The Sayyids ruled a small region around Delhi, with provinces already independent or under governors who acted independently. Gujarat, Malwa, Jaunpur and Bengal had become separate kingdoms, and Multan was lost during Muhammad Shah’s time. Court politics also hurt the dynasty. The vizier Sarwar ul-Mulk controlled Muhammad Shah, and Alam Shah left power to his minister Hamid Khan.
After the Timurid invasion a number of Afghan sardars had set up in the Punjab. The most important was Bahlul Lodi, who had been granted the iqta of Sirhind and checked the Khokhars of the Salt Ranges. Called in to help the Delhi ruler against an attack by the ruler of Malwa, Bahlul stayed on, and his men took control of Delhi. When Alam Shah retired to Badaun, where he died in exile, Bahlul crowned himself in 1451 and the Sayyid dynasty ended.
What Is the Timeline of the Sayyid Dynasty?
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| 1398 | Timur sacks Delhi and appoints Khizr Khan deputy at Multan |
| 28 May 1414 | Khizr Khan takes Delhi |
| 1421 | Mubarak Shah succeeds and drops Timurid allegiance |
| 1434 | Muhammad Shah succeeds |
| 1443 | Alam Shah succeeds |
| 19 April 1451 | Alam Shah abdicates and retires to Badaun |
| 1451 | Bahlul Lodi crowns himself |
What Is the Importance of the Sayyid Period?
As an analytical point, the Sayyid decades show a Sultanate with little more than the title. The Sharqis of Jaunpur kept order across a large tract after the collapse of Delhi’s government, and the provincial sultans of Gujarat, Malwa and Bengal grew stronger, which sets up the fifteenth-century world of regional kingdoms studied in the next category. For the exam, the dynasty is a link between the Tughlaqs and the Lodis, and its dates and rulers are the usual question.
Why Is This Topic Important?
- Chronology link Connects Tughlaqs and Lodis in the list of five dynasties
- Timur’s shadow Shows the long effects of the 1398 invasion
- Prelims favourite Rulers and dates appear in matching questions
What Came Next?
The next topic covers the Lodi dynasty, the last of the five dynasties of the Sultanate. Next topic: Lodi Dynasty (Bahlul Lodi, Sikandar Lodi, Ibrahim Lodi).
Key People and Terms
- Khizr Khan Founder; took Delhi in 1414
- Mubarak Shah Took the title shah
- Alam Shah Last Sayyid, abdicated in 1451
- Sarwar ul-Mulk Vizier of Muhammad Shah
- Langahs Rulers of independent Multan
- Hoshang Shah Ruler of Malwa defeated by Mubarak Shah
Exam Corner
Points to Remember
- Dynasty: 1414 to 1451; founder Khizr Khan.
- Khizr Khan did not take the title sultan.
- Alam Shah retired to Badaun.
- Bahlul Lodi crowned himself in 1451.
- Four Sayyid rulers in all.
Do Not Confuse With
- Sayyid and Lodi dynasties Timurid-linked line from Multan versus the Afghan line from Sirhind
- Khizr Khan and Bahlul Lodi Founder of the Sayyids versus founder of the Lodis
- Alam Shah and Muhammad Shah Last Sayyid versus the third ruler
Memory Hook
Khizr takes, Mubarak crowns, Muhammad struggles, Alam yields.
Mains Angle
Questions on the Sayyids are rare and link to the decline of the Sultanate. These points add depth.
- Weakness Small territory and strong ministers
- Context Timur’s invasion and regional kingdoms
- Transition Afghan sardars of the Punjab
A Question You May Face
An original practice question, not a past paper question.
“Why did the Sayyid dynasty fail to restore the authority of the Delhi Sultanate?”
How to Answer
- Origin Khizr Khan after Timur.
- Rulers Four, with shrinking power.
- Causes Provinces lost and weak kings.
- End Bahlul Lodi in 1451.
GS Relevance
Frequently Asked Questions
Who founded the Sayyid dynasty?
Khizr Khan founded the Sayyid dynasty. Timur had made him deputy of Multan after the sack of Delhi in 1398, and he took Delhi on 28 May 1414 without taking the title of sultan, while nominally acknowledging Timurid suzerainty.
Who were the Sayyid rulers of Delhi?
The four Sayyid rulers were Khizr Khan (1414 to 1421), Mubarak Shah (1421 to 1434), Muhammad Shah (about 1434 to 1443) and Alam Shah (1443 to 1451). They ruled a small region around Delhi from the capital.
Which Sayyid ruler took the title Shah?
Mubarak Shah dropped Timurid allegiance, took the royal title shah and professed allegiance to the caliph. He also defeated Hoshang Shah of Malwa, who had to pay heavy tribute to Delhi during his reign.
How did the Sayyid dynasty end?
Alam Shah, an ineffective ruler who left power to his minister Hamid Khan, abdicated on 19 April 1451 and retired to Badaun. Bahlul Lodi, whom he had made governor of Sirhind, then crowned himself and began the Lodi dynasty.
Did the Sayyids really descend from the Prophet?
The dynasty claimed descent from the Prophet Muhammad, which is the basis of the name Sayyid, but modern historians doubt the claim. They think the family may have been of Arab or Punjabi Khokhar origin.
PYQ Practice — Statement Analysis
1 Khizr Khan took the title of sultan on capturing Delhi.
He never took the title and acknowledged Timurid suzerainty.
2 Bahlul Lodi crowned himself in 1451 and ended Sayyid rule.
Alam Shah had retired to Badaun.
3 The Sayyid dynasty was the fourth dynasty of the Delhi Sultanate.
The Lodis were the fifth.
4 Mubarak Shah professed allegiance to the caliph.
He gave up the Timurid link.
Related Topics
Browse the full Medieval History index