Maarg Manthan · Topic 1.10

Chola Administration (Local Self-Government – Ur, Sabha, Nadu Village Assemblies)

Medieval History β€Ί Early Medieval Period Β· Topic 1.10

The Chola state was a monarchy with a council of ministers, a large army and navy, and an empire divided into mandalams, valanadus and nadus. Its best known feature was village self-government through the ur and the sabha or mahasabha, whose elected committees, as the Uttaramerur records of 919 and 921 show, managed tanks, land and justice.

Share:
Chola Administration (Local Self-Government – Ur, Sabha, Nadu Village Assemblies) - Medieval History - MaargX UPSC Maarg Manthan

At a Glance

  • Head The king, advised by a council of ministers
  • Units Mandalam, valanadu, nadu, village
  • Assemblies Ur (general) and sabha or mahasabha (Brahman villages)
  • Key records Uttaramerur inscriptions of 919 and 921
  • Army Elephants, cavalry, infantry, plus a strong navy
  • Exam link UPSC Prelims, Medieval History: Early Medieval Period

Where Does It Fit?

This is the tenth topic of the category on the early medieval period. The previous topic gave the political history of the Cholas, and this topic explains how they governed. The next topic covers Chola economy and social life. Previous topic: Chola Rulers and Political History (Rajaraja I, Rajendra I). The earlier village arrangements are in Brahmanisation, Land Grants and Peasant Protest in the Peninsula.

How Was the Chola State Organised?

In short: Chola administration rested on a powerful king, a council of ministers, a layered system of territorial units and strong village assemblies.

All authority was in the hands of the king, who had a council of ministers to advise him. The kings often toured to oversee the administration. The army had elephants, cavalry and infantry, called the three limbs of the army, and the infantry was generally armed with spears. Most kings had bodyguards sworn to defend them. The Cholas also had a strong navy that dominated the Malabar and Coromandel coast and, for some time, the whole Bay of Bengal.

What Were the Chola Administrative Units?

Unit Description
Mandalam Province; the empire had four, and princes of the royal family were sometimes governors
Valanadu A group of nadus
Nadu The basic unit, made of villages with close kinship and other ties
Village Managed by assemblies such as the ur and the sabha

The Chola state had areas of central control and loosely administered areas under local control, interspersed with hill and tribal peoples. The number of nadus grew as new land came under cultivation through irrigation works and as hill and tribal people were converted into farmers. Grants to Brahmans and temples also helped expand cultivation. Officials were generally paid by assignments of revenue-bearing lands.

What Were the Ur and the Sabha?

Inscriptions tell us of two assemblies: the ur and the sabha or mahasabha. The ur was a general assembly of the village. The mahasabha was a gathering of adult men in the Brahman villages called agraharams, villages with Brahman settlements in which most of the land was rent-free. These villages had a large measure of autonomy. An executive committee managed affairs, and educated persons who owned property were elected to it by lots or by rotation. Members had to retire every three years.

Other committees helped in assessing and collecting land revenue, keeping law and order and giving justice. One of the most important was the tank committee, which looked after the distribution of water to the fields. The mahasabha could distribute new lands and exercise ownership rights over them, raise loans for the village and levy taxes.

What Do the Uttaramerur Inscriptions Say?

The inscriptions at Uttaramerur, dated to the reign of Parantaka I, record the rules of election in 919 and the changes made in 921. The village had 30 wards, from which committee members were chosen each year. Names of qualified candidates were written on palm-leaf tickets and put in a pot, and a boy drew out as many tickets as there were posts. This is called the kudavolai system.

Rule Detail
Qualification Owner of tax-paying land and of a house built on self-owned land; aged 35 to 70; knowledge of mantras and Brahmana texts
Disqualification Membership of a committee in the last three years, unsubmitted accounts, grave offences and theft
Tenure 360 days; anyone found guilty was removed at once

The inscriptions show a rule-bound system, but as an analytical point, it was limited by property and caste conditions, and the sabha was a Brahman body.

How Did the Cholas Raise Revenue and Build Infrastructure?

The Cholas built royal roads useful for trade and for moving the army. Some gigantic trade guilds traded with Java and Sumatra. They paid close attention to irrigation, used the Kaveri and other rivers, and built many tanks. Some Chola rulers carried out a detailed land survey to fix the government’s share of the land revenue, though the share is not known. Income came from land tax, tolls on trade, taxes on professions and plunder of neighbouring territories. The wealth paid for towns and temples.

The growth of feudalism later restricted the autonomy of the village assemblies.

Why Is This Topic Important?

  • Self-government A well-known example of local self-government in early India
  • Evidence Inscriptions supply unusual detail on election and committees
  • Exam link Terms such as nadu, ur and sabha are common in Prelims

What Came Next?

The next topic covers life in the Chola country: farming, trade, guilds and society. Next topic: Chola Socio-Economic Life.

Key People and Terms

  • Ur General village assembly
  • Sabha or mahasabha Assembly of adult men in Brahman villages
  • Agraharam Brahman village with rent-free land
  • Nadu Basic unit of administration
  • Valanadu Group of nadus
  • Kudavolai Pot-ticket system of election

Exam Corner

Points to Remember

  • Four mandalams; the basic unit was the nadu.
  • Ur was general; mahasabha met in agraharams.
  • Members retired every three years.
  • Uttaramerur: 919 and 921, Parantaka I.
  • Tank committee distributed water.

Do Not Confuse With

  • Ur and sabha General village assembly versus the assembly of Brahman villages
  • Nadu and valanadu Basic unit versus a group of nadus
  • Chola mandalam and Mughal suba Early medieval province versus a later imperial province

Memory Hook

Ur is for all, sabha is for agraharams, a boy draws the pot.

Mains Angle

Questions on Chola government stress village democracy and its limits. These points add depth.

  • Strength Elected committees, tank management, accountability and removal of offenders
  • Limit Property and caste conditions; later feudalism
  • Link Foundation for temple-centred economic life

A Question You May Face

An original practice question, not a past paper question.

“Examine the working of village self-government under the Cholas and its limitations.”

How to Answer

  1. Structure Mandalam, valanadu, nadu.
  2. Assemblies Ur and mahasabha.
  3. Evidence Uttaramerur rules.
  4. Limit Property conditions and feudalism.

GS Relevance

Prelims: Early Medieval India, Chola government, village assemblies. GS Paper 1: local self-government in ancient and medieval India.

Frequently Asked Questions

What were the ur and the sabha in Chola villages?

The ur was the general assembly of a village, while the sabha or mahasabha was the assembly of adult men in Brahman villages called agraharams. The mahasabha managed land, raised loans and levied taxes through committees chosen by lot or rotation.

What are the Uttaramerur inscriptions?

The Uttaramerur inscriptions of the Chola king Parantaka I record the election rules of a village assembly in 919 and amendments in 921. They describe 30 wards, qualifications such as property and age 35 to 70, and a pot-ticket draw by a young boy.

How was the Chola empire divided?

The Chola state was divided into four mandalams or provinces, which were made up of valanadus, and valanadus into nadus. The nadu, a group of villages with close ties, was the basic unit, and princes of the royal family were sometimes appointed governors.

How long did village committee members serve?

Members of the executive committee of a mahasabha served for a fixed term and had to retire every three years. The Uttaramerur records give a tenure of 360 days for the annual committees, and offenders found guilty were removed immediately.

What were the sources of Chola revenue?

The Cholas drew income from land tax, tolls on trade, taxes on professions and plunder of neighbouring territories. Some rulers had the land surveyed to fix the state's share of revenue, but the exact share is not known.

PYQ Practice β€” Statement Analysis

1 The mahasabha was an assembly of Brahman villages called agraharams.
True

The ur was the general assembly.

2 Chola village committee members served for life.
False

They retired every three years.

3 The Uttaramerur inscriptions belong to the reign of Parantaka I.
True

They date from 919 and 921.

4 The basic unit of Chola administration was the mandalam.
False

The basic unit was the nadu; the mandalam was a province.

Share: