Right to Freedom (Articles 19–22)
Indian Polity › Fundamental Rights · Topic 6.4
The Right to Freedom in Articles 19 to 22 covers six freedoms for citizens, protection against retrospective penalties, double jeopardy and self-incrimination, the right to life and personal liberty, and safeguards against arrest and preventive detention.
10 min read · UPSC Prelims · Polity · Fundamental Rights
At a Glance
- What it is The six freedoms of Article 19, protection in respect of conviction (Article 20), life and personal liberty (Article 21), and protection against arrest and detention (Article 22)
- Articles Articles 19 to 22, with Article 21A on education
- Article 19 Available only to citizens; protected only against State action
- Key cases Gopalan (1950), Maneka Gandhi (1978), Anuradha Bhasin (2020)
- Exam link UPSC Prelims, Polity: Fundamental Rights
Where Does It Fit?
This is the fourth topic of the category on Fundamental Rights. After the Right to Equality, the Constitution lists the Right to Freedom. It is spread over Articles 19 to 22 and is the richest source of judicial interpretation among the Fundamental Rights.
Article 19: Protection of Six Rights
Article 19 guarantees to all citizens six rights: to freedom of speech and expression; to assemble peaceably and without arms; to form associations, unions or co-operative societies; to move freely throughout the territory of India; to reside and settle in any part of India; and to practise any profession or carry on any occupation, trade or business. Originally there were seven rights, but the right to acquire, hold and dispose of property was deleted by the 44th Amendment Act, 1978. These six rights are protected only against State action and not against private individuals. They are available only to citizens and not to foreigners or to companies.
| Right | Grounds of reasonable restriction |
|---|---|
| Speech and expression (19(1)(a)) | Article 19(2): sovereignty and integrity of India (16th Amendment, 1963), security of the State, friendly relations with foreign states (1st Amendment, 1951), public order (1st Amendment), decency or morality, contempt of court, defamation, incitement to an offence (1st Amendment) |
| Assembly (19(1)(b)) | Article 19(3): sovereignty and integrity of India, public order |
| Association (19(1)(c)) | Article 19(4): sovereignty and integrity of India, public order, morality |
| Movement (19(1)(d)) and residence (19(1)(e)) | Article 19(5): interests of the general public, protection of the interests of any scheduled tribe |
| Profession, trade or business (19(1)(g)) | Article 19(6): interests of the general public, professional or technical qualifications, trade or business carried on by the State to the exclusion of citizens (1st Amendment) |
Speech, Assembly and Association
Freedom of speech and expression means the right to express views, opinions and beliefs freely by word of mouth, writing, printing, picturing or any other manner. The Supreme Court has held that it includes freedom of the press, the right to know about government activities, freedom of silence, the right to fly the national flag, the right of voters to know the antecedents of candidates, the right against pre-censorship and the right to demonstration or picketing, but not the right to strike. In Anuradha Bhasin (2020) it was applied to the internet.
Freedom of assembly includes holding public meetings, demonstrations and processions. It can be exercised only on public land and the assembly must be peaceful and unarmed. Violent, disorderly or riotous assemblies are not protected, and the right does not include the right to strike. A magistrate can restrain an assembly if there is a risk of obstruction, danger to human life or disturbance of tranquillity; this power under the old Section 144 of the Code of Criminal Procedure is now in Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita.
Freedom of association covers political parties, companies, firms, societies, clubs and trade unions, the right to continue an association, and the negative right not to join one. The right to obtain recognition is not a Fundamental Right, and trade unions have no guaranteed right to strike or to declare a lock-out.
Movement, Residence and Profession
The freedom of movement entitles every citizen to move freely throughout the country. It underlines that India is one unit for its citizens and aims at national feeling and not parochialism. Restrictions are allowed in the general public interest and to protect scheduled tribes, whose areas restrict the entry of outsiders to protect their culture, language and traditional vocation. It has an internal dimension, protected by Article 19, and an external dimension (to go abroad and return), which is dealt with by Article 21.
The freedom of residence has two parts: to reside, meaning to stay temporarily, and to settle, meaning to set up a home permanently. The two freedoms overlap and are complementary. The freedom of profession is very wide as it covers all means of earning a livelihood. The State may prescribe professional qualifications and may itself carry on any trade or business, even as a monopoly, without having to justify it. The right does not cover immoral trades (trafficking in women or children) or dangerous ones (harmful drugs, explosives), which the State can prohibit or license. In Anuradha Bhasin (2020) the Supreme Court held that trade over the internet is protected by Article 19(1)(g), that restrictions must pass the test of proportionality, and that indefinite suspension of internet services is impermissible.
Article 20: Protection in Respect of Conviction for Offences
Article 20 protects an accused person, whether a citizen, foreigner or company, against arbitrary and excessive punishment. It has three provisions.
| Protection | Meaning |
|---|---|
| No ex-post-facto law | No conviction except for a law in force at the time of the act, and no penalty greater than the law then prescribed. It applies only to criminal laws, not civil or tax laws, and bars conviction or sentence, not trial |
| No double jeopardy | No person shall be prosecuted and punished for the same offence more than once; available only in proceedings before a court or judicial tribunal |
| No self-incrimination | No accused can be compelled to be a witness against himself; covers oral and documentary evidence but not material objects, thumb impressions, specimen signatures, blood specimens or exhibition of the body, and only criminal proceedings |
Article 21: Protection of Life and Personal Liberty
Article 21 declares that no person shall be deprived of life or personal liberty except according to procedure established by law. It is available to citizens and non-citizens. In Gopalan (1950) the Supreme Court took a narrow view: Article 21 protects only against arbitrary executive action, not against a law, because “procedure established by law” differs from the American “due process of law”, and personal liberty means only liberty of the body.
In Maneka Gandhi (1978) the Court overruled Gopalan. It held that a law depriving a person of life or liberty must prescribe a procedure that is reasonable, fair and just and not arbitrary, fanciful or oppressive, and that the procedure must conform to natural justice. This effectively brought in due process. The right to life is not merely animal existence but includes the right to live with human dignity, and personal liberty is of the widest amplitude.
| Case (year) | Right declared part of Article 21 |
|---|---|
| Satwant Singh Sawhney (1967) | Right to travel abroad |
| M.H. Hoskot (1978) | Right to free legal aid |
| Hussainara Khatoon (1979) | Right to speedy trial |
| Francis Coralie Mullin (1981) | Right to live with human dignity |
| Olga Tellis (1985) | Right to livelihood |
| Shantistar Builders (1990) | Right to shelter |
| K.S. Puttaswamy (2017) | Right to privacy |
| Common Cause (2018) | Right to die with dignity (passive euthanasia) |
Article 21A, added by the 86th Amendment Act (2002), makes free and compulsory education for children aged six to fourteen a Fundamental Right; it is covered in a separate topic.
Article 22: Protection Against Arrest and Detention
Detention is of two types. Punitive detention punishes a person after trial and conviction. Preventive detention is detention without trial and conviction, to prevent a future offence; it is a precaution based on suspicion. Article 22 has two parts.
| Part | Applies to | Safeguards |
|---|---|---|
| First part | Arrest or detention under ordinary law (not available to enemy aliens or to those under preventive detention) | Right to be informed of grounds; right to consult a lawyer; production before a magistrate within 24 hours excluding journey time; release after 24 hours unless the magistrate authorises further detention |
| Second part | Preventive detention, for citizens and aliens | Detention beyond three months only if an advisory board of high court judges reports sufficient cause; grounds communicated (facts against public interest need not be disclosed); opportunity to make a representation |
The 44th Amendment Act (1978) reduced the period without an advisory board from three to two months, but this has not been brought into force, so three months continues. Parliament has exclusive power to make preventive detention laws for defence, foreign affairs and the security of India; Parliament and the states have concurrent power for the security of a state, public order and essential supplies. Parliamentary preventive detention laws include the Preventive Detention Act, 1950 (expired 1969), MISA 1971 (repealed 1978), COFEPOSA 1974, National Security Act 1980, TADA 1985 (repealed 1995), POTA 2002 (repealed 2004) and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967, as amended in 2004, 2008, 2012 and 2019. No democratic country has made preventive detention an integral part of its Constitution as India has.
Why Is This Topic Important?
- Heart of liberty Articles 19 to 22 form the core of civil liberties and attract the most case law
- Maneka shift The change from procedure to due process is a standard Prelims and Mains theme
- Detention laws Preventive detention and its safeguards are asked regularly
What Came Next?
The next topic covers the Right Against Exploitation under Articles 23 and 24.
Key People and Terms
- Reasonable restriction A limit on a right allowed only on grounds listed in the Article, and reviewable by courts
- Ex-post-facto law A law that imposes penalties retrospectively
- Double jeopardy Being prosecuted and punished twice for the same offence
- Preventive detention Detention without trial to prevent a future offence
- Procedure established by law The wording of Article 21, read after Maneka Gandhi as a fair and just procedure
- Detenu A person held under a preventive detention law
Exam Corner
Points to Remember
- Article 19 has six freedoms; property was dropped by the 44th Amendment, 1978.
- Article 20 has three protections: ex-post-facto, double jeopardy, self-incrimination.
- Gopalan (1950) narrow view; Maneka Gandhi (1978) due process.
- Preventive detention beyond three months needs an advisory board; the 44th Amendment change to two months is not in force.
Do Not Confuse With
- Article 19 and Article 21 Article 19 is for citizens; Article 21 is for all persons
- Punitive and preventive detention One punishes after trial; the other prevents without trial
- Procedure established by law and due process The first is the Indian wording; Maneka Gandhi read fairness into it
- Article 20 and Article 22 Article 20 is about conviction; Article 22 is about arrest and detention
Memory Hook
Nineteen gives six freedoms, Twenty guards the accused, Twenty-one guards life and Twenty-two guards the arrested.
Mains Angle
Questions on this topic usually ask about the balance between liberty and restriction. Use these points to add depth.
- Reasonable restrictions Article 19 allows limits only on listed grounds, and courts test their reasonableness
- Expansion of Article 21 Maneka Gandhi turned a narrow guarantee into a source of many rights
- Proportionality online Anuradha Bhasin applied Article 19 and proportionality to internet shutdowns
- Preventive detention Article 22 permits it with safeguards, and critics say it takes away the spirit of the chapter
A Question You May Face
An original practice question, not a past paper question.
“How has the Supreme Court widened the scope of Article 21 since the Gopalan case? Illustrate with cases.”
How to Answer
- Introduction Article 21 and Gopalan’s narrow reading.
- Maneka Gandhi Fair, just and reasonable procedure and natural justice.
- Rights recognised Privacy, livelihood, shelter, speedy trial and legal aid.
- Conclusion Article 21 as a source of expanding liberties.
GS Relevance
Frequently Asked Questions
Which six freedoms does Article 19 guarantee?
Article 19 guarantees to citizens the freedom of speech and expression, assembly, association, movement, residence and profession. A seventh right, to property, was deleted by the 44th Amendment Act, 1978. These rights are protected only against State action.
What are the three protections of Article 20?
Article 20 protects an accused from ex-post-facto criminal laws, from double jeopardy and from self-incrimination. It applies to citizens, foreigners and companies alike, and it protects against conviction and sentence under retrospective criminal laws, not trial.
How did Maneka Gandhi change Article 21?
Maneka Gandhi (1978) overruled Gopalan (1950). It held that the procedure established by law must be reasonable, fair and just, and conform to natural justice, which in effect introduced due process and made Article 21 protect against arbitrary legislative action also.
What rights has the Supreme Court read into Article 21?
Among others, the Court has recognised the right to live with human dignity, livelihood, shelter, privacy, speedy trial, free legal aid, a decent environment, health, travelling abroad and dying with dignity (passive euthanasia). Many of these came after the Maneka Gandhi case.
What rights does a person arrested under ordinary law have?
Under Article 22 the person must be told the grounds of arrest, can consult and be defended by a lawyer, and must be produced before a magistrate within 24 hours excluding journey time. After 24 hours release follows unless the magistrate authorises detention.
How long can preventive detention last without an advisory board?
Three months. Beyond that, an advisory board of high court judges must report sufficient cause. The 44th Amendment Act (1978) reduced it to two months, but that change has not been brought into force, so three months continues.
Which laws provide for preventive detention?
Examples are the Preventive Detention Act 1950, MISA 1971, COFEPOSA 1974, the National Security Act 1980, TADA 1985, POTA 2002 and the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act 1967 as amended. Some were repealed, such as MISA, TADA and POTA.
PYQ Practice — Statement Analysis
1 The six freedoms of Article 19 are available to foreigners as well as citizens.
They are available only to citizens.
2 Article 20 protects against double jeopardy only in proceedings before a court or judicial tribunal.
It does not apply to departmental or administrative proceedings.
3 In the Gopalan case the Supreme Court held that Article 21 protects against arbitrary legislative action.
Gopalan held it protects only against executive action; Maneka Gandhi widened it.
4 Article 21 is available to both citizens and non-citizens.
It protects every person.
5 The 44th Amendment reduction of detention without advisory board to two months is in force.
It has not been brought into force, so three months continues.
Related Topics
Browse the full Indian Polity index