An Initiative by SAARTHI IAS
Maarg Manthan · Topic 18.20

Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing

Environment & Ecology › International Environmental Governance and Conventions · Topic 18.20

The Nagoya Protocol on Access to Genetic Resources and the Fair and Equitable Sharing of Benefits Arising from their Utilization to the Convention on Biological Diversity (the Nagoya Protocol, or ABS Protocol) is the CBD's second protocol. It was adopted on 29 October 2010 at the tenth meeting of the Conference of the Parties (COP10) in Nagoya, Japan, and entered into force on 12 October 2014 after 50 ratifications. It implements the third objective of the CBD, fair and equitable sharing of benefits from genetic resources. Under it, users of genetic resources and associated traditional knowledge from another country must get the Prior Informed Consent (PIC) of the provider country and agree Mutually Agreed Terms (MAT) on benefit sharing, which can be monetary (fees, royalties) or non-monetary (joint research, technology transfer, training). Providers must have clear, transparent access rules, and users must follow checkpoints and compliance measures, so that biopiracy is checked. The Protocol covers traditional knowledge of indigenous and local communities and gives them a role. A Global Multilateral Benefit-Sharing Mechanism (Article 10) was discussed for cases where PIC cannot be obtained, and the issue of digital sequence information led to the Cali Fund, agreed at COP16 in 2024. India ratified the Nagoya Protocol on 9 October 2012, and implements it through the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 and National Biodiversity Authority guidelines.

Share:
Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing - Environment & Ecology - MaargX UPSC Maarg Manthan

At a Glance

  • Adopted 29 October 2010, Nagoya
  • In force 12 October 2014
  • Core terms PIC and MAT
  • India ratified 9 October 2012
  • Aim Fair benefit sharing
  • Exam link UPSC Prelims, Environment & Ecology: International Environmental Governance and Conventions

Where Does It Fit?

This topic follows the Cartagena Protocol and covers the CBD’s other protocol, which is implemented in India through the Biological Diversity Act. It leads to the Aichi Targets. Previous topic: Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety. Next topic: Aichi Biodiversity Targets.

What Does the Nagoya Protocol Require?

Element Details
Adoption and force Adopted 29 October 2010 at COP10, Nagoya; in force 12 October 2014
Purpose Fair and equitable sharing of benefits from use of genetic resources, the third CBD objective
Prior Informed Consent Users need permission from the provider country or community before accessing resources
Mutually Agreed Terms Contracts setting out how benefits will be shared
Benefits Monetary (royalties, fees) and non-monetary (research cooperation, technology transfer, training)
Traditional knowledge Covered; communities must be involved and benefit
Compliance Designated checkpoints, internationally recognised certificates of compliance and monitoring of use
  • Biopiracy: protocol aims to curb unauthorised use, such as patents on neem or turmeric
  • Article 10: a possible global multilateral benefit-sharing mechanism for resources found across borders or without consent
  • Digital sequence information: use of genetic data without physical samples; Cali Fund agreed in 2024 so firms using DSI pay a share
  • India: ratified 9 October 2012 at COP11 in Hyderabad
  • Domestic law: Biological Diversity Act 2002 and ABS guidelines 2014
  • NBA: competent national authority
  • Benefit-sharing cases: Kani tribe and Arogyapacha example
  • Concerns: compliance costs for researchers and unclear rules

What Else Should You Remember?

  • Genetic resources: genetic material of actual or potential value
  • Utilization: research and development on genetic or biochemical composition
  • COP10 Nagoya: also adopted the Strategic Plan and Aichi Targets
  • Entry into force: 90 days after the 50th ratification
  • Parties: about 140 parties including India and the EU
  • Non-parties: United States is not a CBD party
  • ABS Clearing-House: an online platform for information on access rules
  • Internationally recognised certificate of compliance: proof that access was legal
  • Checkpoints: places such as patent offices or research funders where compliance is checked
  • Model clauses: standard contract terms for MAT
  • Hyderabad COP11: agreed on funds for implementing the Protocol
  • Kani tribe: a Kerala tribe that shared benefits from the anti-fatigue plant arogyapacha, a notable ABS case in India
  • Neem and turmeric cases: patents challenged and revoked after Indian evidence
  • TKDL: Traditional Knowledge Digital Library prevents wrongful patents
  • Basmati: a trade dispute over names and patents
  • Biodiversity Management Committees: local bodies that can claim benefits under the Biological Diversity Act
  • Benefit sharing in India: NBA has approved ABS agreements with payments to local committees
  • Cali Fund: launched in 2025 for benefit sharing from digital sequence information
  • WIPO treaty: 2024 treaty requiring patent applicants to disclose origin of genetic resources
  • Traditional knowledge: communities’ rights recognised under Article 7
  • Pandemic pathogens: Nagoya applies to some pathogens, with special provisions in Article 8
  • Link to previous: see Cartagena Protocol on Biosafety
  • Link to next: see Aichi Biodiversity Targets
  • Link to BD Act: see Biological Diversity Act, 2002
  • Caution: parties count and DSI arrangements are changing, so check the CBD website
  • Exam hint: remember PIC, MAT, the dates and India’s ratification at Hyderabad
  • Biopiracy: biopiracy refers to unauthorised use of genetic resources or knowledge, which the Protocol seeks to prevent through consent and monitoring
  • Sovereign rights: states have sovereign rights over their genetic resources under the CBD, which the Protocol operationalises
  • Research versus commerce: the Protocol encourages simpler access for non-commercial research while commercial use needs benefit sharing
  • Community protocols: communities can set their own protocols for access to their knowledge and resources
  • Pandemic and pathogen sharing: the Protocol’s Article 8 allows faster access for pathogens in health emergencies, linked to later WHO pandemic accords
  • User compliance: users must keep records, declare origin in patent or research funding applications, and monitor utilisation

Why Does It Matter for the Exam?

  1. Adopted: 2010
  2. In force: 2014
  3. Terms: PIC, MAT
  4. Current affairs link: DSI and Cali Fund
  5. Common errors: confusing Nagoya with Cartagena

As an analytical point, the Nagoya Protocol tries to turn the principle of national sovereignty over genetic resources into practical benefit sharing. Its success depends on clear access rules, effective checkpoints and the involvement of local communities who hold the knowledge.

Why Is This Topic Important?

  • Right Consent
  • Share MAT
  • Check Compliance

What Came Next?

The next topic covers the Aichi Biodiversity Targets. Next topic: Aichi Biodiversity Targets.

Key People and Terms

  • ABS Access and benefit sharing
  • PIC Prior Informed Consent
  • MAT Mutually Agreed Terms
  • DSI Digital sequence information
  • Biopiracy Unfair use of resources
  • TKDL Traditional Knowledge Digital Library

Exam Corner

Points to Remember

  • Adopted 2010, force 2014.
  • Terms: PIC and MAT.
  • India ratified 2012.
  • Won at COP10, Nagoya.
  • Domestic law: BD Act 2002.

Do Not Confuse With

  • Nagoya and Cartagena Benefit sharing versus biosafety
  • PIC and MAT Permission versus benefit contract
  • Nagoya Protocol and Aichi Targets Legal protocol versus target set

Memory Hook

Ten in Nagoya: consent first, terms next, share the gain.

Mains Angle

Questions ask for key terms and dates. These points help.

  • Aim ABS
  • Tools PIC, MAT
  • India BD Act

A Question You May Face

An original practice question, not a past paper question.

“Explain the Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing and its implementation in India.”

How to Answer

  1. Aim ABS.
  2. Tools PIC, MAT.
  3. Issues DSI.
  4. India BD Act.

GS Relevance

Prelims: PIC, MAT, dates, India. GS Paper 3: access and benefit sharing.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is the Nagoya Protocol?

The Nagoya Protocol on Access and Benefit Sharing is a supplementary agreement to the Convention on Biological Diversity, adopted on 29 October 2010 in Nagoya, Japan and in force since 12 October 2014. It provides a legal framework for fair and equitable sharing of benefits from the use of genetic resources and related traditional knowledge.

What are Prior Informed Consent and Mutually Agreed Terms?

Prior Informed Consent means that a user must obtain permission from the provider country, or community where relevant, before accessing genetic resources or traditional knowledge. Mutually Agreed Terms are the contract between the user and provider setting out conditions of use and how benefits will be shared, in money or through non-monetary benefits.

How does India implement the Nagoya Protocol?

India ratified the Protocol on 9 October 2012 during COP11 in Hyderabad. It implements it through the Biological Diversity Act, 2002 and the 2014 guidelines on access and benefit sharing, with the National Biodiversity Authority granting approvals for foreign access, setting benefit-sharing terms and channelling money to local Biodiversity Management Committees.

What is digital sequence information?

Digital sequence information refers to genetic data, such as DNA and RNA sequences, stored in databases and used in research without needing a physical sample. Because it can bypass access rules, countries debated how to share benefits from its use. COP16 in 2024 agreed on the Cali Fund, to which companies using DSI should contribute a share of profits.

What is biopiracy?

Biopiracy is the unauthorised use or patenting of biological resources or traditional knowledge from a country or community, without consent or fair sharing of benefits. Cases such as patents on neem and turmeric led to challenges and revocation. The Nagoya Protocol and tools like the Traditional Knowledge Digital Library are meant to prevent such cases.

PYQ Practice — Statement Analysis

1 The Nagoya Protocol came into force in 2014.
True

After 50 ratifications.

2 The Nagoya Protocol deals with biosafety.
False

It deals with access and benefit sharing.

3 India ratified the Protocol in 2012.
True

At Hyderabad.

4 PIC stands for Prior Informed Contract.
False

It stands for Prior Informed Consent.

Past Mains Questions on This Topic

This topic comes under International Environmental Governance and Conventions. UPSC Mains questions asked on the matching syllabus topic, year-wise with marks:

Share: