Bindusara and Early Life of Ashoka
Ancient History › Mauryan Empire · Topic 6.5
Bindusara, Chandragupta’s son (about 297 to 273 BC), kept the empire intact, was called Amitrochates by the Greeks and maintained diplomatic links with Antiochus I through Deimachos. His son Ashoka served as viceroy of Taxila and Ujjain, but Buddhist legends of killing 99 brothers are exaggerated; a four-year gap before his coronation around 268 BC suggests a succession struggle.
5 min read · UPSC Prelims · History · Mauryan Empire
At a Glance
- Bindusara Reigned about 297 to 273 BC
- Greek name Amitrochates
- Envoy Deimachos of Antiochus I
- Ashoka’s posts Viceroy of Taxila and Ujjain
- Succession Struggle, coronation about 268 BC
- Exam link UPSC Prelims, Ancient History: Mauryan Empire
Where Does It Fit?
This is the fifth topic of the category on the Mauryan Empire. The previous topic covered the economy, and this one covers Bindusara and Ashoka’s youth. The next topic covers the Rock Edict Claimed toll 150,000 deported; 100,000 killed Policy shift…">Kalinga war. Previous topic: Mauryan Economy and State Control.
What Do We Know of Bindusara?
In short: Bindusara held the empire together and kept up diplomacy with the Greek world.
Chandragupta Maurya was succeeded by Bindusara, whose reign is important for its continuing links with the Greek princes. Another account says he succeeded in 297 BCE in a peaceful and natural transition, ruled for 25 years and must have died in 272 BCE, and that he continued to be advised by Chanakya and other capable ministers. Greek writers called him Amitrochates or Allitrochades, probably from the Sanskrit amitraghata, meaning slayer of enemies. Greek sources mention the diplomacy with the Seleucid king Antiochus I, whose ambassador Deimachos was at his court. Athenaeus, citing Hegesander, records that Bindusara asked Antiochus for sweet wine, dried figs and a sophist, and Antiochus sent the wine and figs but refused the sophist. Historians disagree on how far the empire grew under him, and some hold that he mainly kept the inherited territory. In the reign of Bindusara, the citizens of Taxila complained against misrule by wicked ministers (dushtamatyas), and the grievance was redressed by sending Ashoka, as discussed in Pushyamitra Shunga Chief causes Reaction, finance, oppression, frontier…">Causes of the Decline of the Mauryan Empire.
| Item | Detail |
|---|---|
| Reign | About 297 to 273 BC (one account: died 272 BCE) |
| Greek names | Amitrochates, Allitrochades |
| Greek contacts | Antiochus I and envoy Deimachos |
| Adviser | Chanakya and other ministers (another account) |
What Was Ashoka’s Early Career?
His son Ashoka is the greatest of the Mauryan rulers. Ashoka was born around 304 BCE, probably at Pataliputra, though the date is uncertain. His mother is named variously as Subhadrangi or Dharma in different traditions, and her identity is not reliably known. Ashoka was not Bindusara’s chosen successor. According to another account, Ashoka had been the viceroy of Taxila when he put down a revolt against local officials by the people of Taxila, and was later viceroy of Ujjain, the capital of Avanti and a major commercial city. The Buddhist text Ashokavadana says Bindusara sent him to suppress a rebellion at Taxila, while the Sri Lankan tradition says he governed Ujjain. The Sri Lankan chronicles Mahavamsa and Dipavamsa say that on the way to Ujjain he met Devi, a merchant’s daughter at Vidisha, who bore him Mahinda and Sanghamitta. These are traditions and not proven history, and only Karuvaki, a queen, is named in Ashoka’s own inscriptions.
How Did Ashoka Become Emperor?
The throne reached Ashoka only four years after his father’s death, in about 268 BCE, according to another account, which indicates a struggle between Bindusara’s sons for succession. The Mahavamsa describes a four-year interregnum before the consecration, which may reflect a war of succession. According to Buddhist tradition, Ashoka was so cruel in his early life that he killed his ninety-nine brothers to win the throne, but the statement is based on a legend and may be mythical. Ashoka’s biography, written by Buddhist authors, is so full of fiction that it cannot be taken seriously. Susima, the eldest son, is named in legend as the intended heir. The reliable history of Ashoka begins with his own inscriptions, which started to speak to the people directly, as discussed in Ashokan Inscriptions. The consequences of his early campaign, the Kalinga war in the eighth year of his reign, follow in Kalinga War and its Impact.
| Account | Claim | Reliability |
|---|---|---|
| Mahavamsa | Viceroy of Ujjain; killed many brothers | Tradition; numbers exaggerated |
| Ashokavadana | Sent to put down Taxila revolt | Legend |
| another account | Viceroy of Taxila and Ujjain; throne in 268 BCE after four years | Inference of a succession struggle |
| Ashoka’s edicts | Name, titles and policy only | Primary evidence |
As an analytical point, the early life of Ashoka shows how historians treat religious biographies: the stories of the 99 brothers and of fierce youth emphasise his later conversion, while epigraphy and the gap before coronation give firmer ground. Dating differs by a few years across accounts, so answers should say “about” and note the variation. The founding of the dynasty is in Chandragupta Maurya and the Founding of the Mauryan Empire.
Why Is This Topic Important?
- Succession question Often asked
- Source criticism Legends versus edicts
- Greek diplomacy Contacts with Seleucids
What Came Next?
The next topic describes the Kalinga war and its impact. Next topic: Kalinga War and its Impact.
Key People and Terms
- Amitrochates Greek name of Bindusara
- Amitraghata Slayer of enemies
- Deimachos Greek ambassador
- Viceroy Governor of a province
- Ashokavadana Buddhist text on Ashoka
- Interregnum Gap between reigns
Exam Corner
Points to Remember
- Bindusara is Amitrochates to the Greeks.
- Greek envoy: Deimachos of Antiochus I.
- Ashoka governed Taxila and Ujjain.
- A four-year gap before coronation.
- The 99 brothers story is legendary.
Do Not Confuse With
- Bindusara and Ashoka Father versus son
- Taxila and Ujjain North-west versus Avanti viceroyalties
- Ashokavadana and Mahavamsa Northern versus Sri Lankan tradition
Memory Hook
Wine and figs for Antiochus, no sophist; Ashoka rules Taxila and Ujjain, then waits four years for the crown.
Mains Angle
Questions ask about continuity and succession. These points add depth.
- Continuity Bindusara
- Succession Four-year gap
- Sources Legends
A Question You May Face
An original practice question, not a past paper question.
“Discuss the reign of Bindusara and the early life of Ashoka, noting the problems of the sources.”
How to Answer
- Bindusara Diplomacy.
- Ashoka Viceroyalties.
- Succession Struggle.
- Sources Legends.
GS Relevance
Frequently Asked Questions
Who was Bindusara?
Bindusara was the second Mauryan emperor and the son of Chandragupta Maurya, ruling from about 297 BCE for around 25 years. Greek writers called him Amitrochates, and he continued the close interaction with Greek states of West Asia, including an exchange of envoys.
What did Bindusara ask Antiochus I for?
Athenaeus, citing Hegesander, records that Bindusara asked the Seleucid king Antiochus I for sweet wine, dried figs and a sophist. Antiochus sent the wine and figs but refused the sophist. The exchange is reported by ancient authors, and its details are uncertain.
What posts did Ashoka hold before becoming emperor?
According to another account, Ashoka was viceroy of Taxila, where he put down a revolt against local officials, and later viceroy of Ujjain, the capital of Avanti and a major commercial city. The Sri Lankan chronicles mention Ujjain.
Did Ashoka kill his ninety-nine brothers?
Buddhist tradition says so, but the statement rests on legend and may be mythical. Ashoka's biography written by Buddhist authors contains much fiction. A four-year gap between Bindusara's death and Ashoka's coronation suggests a succession struggle, but details are unverified.
When did Ashoka become emperor?
Dates vary by account. Another account puts Bindusara's death in 272 BCE and Ashoka's accession in 268 BCE after a four-year gap, while another account dates his reign from 273 BC. Historians treat the exact year as uncertain.
PYQ Practice — Statement Analysis
1 Greek writers called Bindusara Amitrochates.
This likely derives from the Sanskrit amitraghata.
2 Ashoka was Bindusara's chosen successor and ascended the throne immediately.
A four-year gap suggests a succession struggle.
3 Ashoka was viceroy of Ujjain before becoming emperor.
He also governed Taxila according to another account.
4 The story of Ashoka killing ninety-nine brothers is fully supported by his inscriptions.
It rests on legend and is probably exaggerated.
Related Topics
Browse the full Ancient History index