Practice

Statutory Accountability Bodies: RAS Prelims MCQs

78 RAS Prelims MCQs on statutory accountability bodies in Rajasthan cover the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, the State Election Commission, the Rajasthan Information Commission and the State Women Commission. They ask about the constitutional provisions, appointment, removal, powers and penalties of each body, so learn who appoints, who removes and to whom each reports.

Practice questions based on the RPSC RAS Prelims syllabus. They follow the exam pattern but are not past-paper questions.

Clear filters

Showing 31–40 of 78 questions

RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q31. On which date was the Rajasthan Information Commission (RIC) officially constituted via a state gazette notification?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q32. Consider the following statements regarding the Rajasthan Information Commission:
I. It is a statutory body, not a constitutional body.
II. It was established under Section 15 of the Right to Information Act, 2005.
III. It acts as the final appellate authority for information requests at the state level.
Which of the above statements are correct?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q33. Which of the following pairs concerning the chapters/sections of the RTI Act, 2005 related to State Information Commissions is incorrectly matched?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q34. Who was appointed as the first Chief Information Commissioner of Rajasthan?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q35. Consider the following powers granted to the State Information Commission under the RTI Act, 2005:
I. Power to order a public authority to compensate the complainant.
II. Power to impose a penalty on the State Public Information Officer.
III. Power to recommend disciplinary action against the State Public Information Officer.
IV. Power to amend the provisions of the RTI Act if deemed necessary for state implementation.
Which of the above combination of statements correctly identifies the powers of the RIC?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q36. Which of the following is not a member of the statutory committee that recommends the appointment of the State Chief Information Commissioner to the Governor?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q37. Match List-I (Authority/Role in RIC) with List- II (Function under RTI Act):
Authority/Role in RICFunction under RTI Act
A. Governori. Conducts inquiry into allegations of misbehavior for removal
B. Appointment Committee (CM, LoP, Cabinet Minister)ii. Recommends candidates for appointment
C. Supreme Courtiii. Acts as the second appellate authority
D. State Information Commissioniv. Formally appoints the Commissioners
Select the correct code:
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q38. Consider the following statements regarding the tenure of Information Commissioners after the RTI (Amendment) Act, 2019:
Statement I: The tenure of the State Chief Information Commissioner is now strictly fixed at 5 years.
Statement II: The term of office is now prescribed by the Central Government, which has notified it as 3 years.
Identify the correct option:
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q39. Consider the following fields of knowledge/ experience:
I. Law
II. Science and Technology
III. Social Service
IV. Management
V. Journalism and Mass Media According to the RTI Act, 2005, persons of eminence in which of the above fields are eligible to be appointed as Information Commissioners?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q40. What is the prescribed time limit for filing a second appeal to the State Information Commission against the decision of a First Appellate Authority?

Answer key for these questions

QCorrect answer
31(b) 18 April 2006
32(d) I, II and III
33(d) Section 18 - Power to make rules by the State Government.
34(b) M.D. Kaurani
35(c) I, II and III only
36(d) The Chief Justice of the State High Court
37(a) A-iv, B-ii, C-i, D-iii
38(b) Statement I is incorrect and Statement II is correct
39(d) I, II, III, IV and V
40(d) 90 days

Key facts from Statutory Accountability Bodies

  • The Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ordinance came into effect on 20 August 1949.
  • The President removes the Chairman or a member of the RPSC, after an inquiry by the Supreme Court on a reference.
  • Article 243K provides for the State Election Commission, which conducts Panchayati Raj elections; the Rajasthan SEC was constituted in July 1994 and its Commissioner is appointed by the Governor.
  • A second appeal to the Information Commission must be made within 90 days; the penalty on an officer is Rs 250 per day, up to Rs 25,000.
  • The burden of proving a denial of information rests on the Public Information Officer.
  • The Rajasthan State Women Commission has a Chairperson, three non-official members and a Member-Secretary.

Frequently asked questions

How many RAS Prelims practice MCQs are there on Statutory Accountability Bodies?

This page has 78 practice MCQs on Statutory Accountability Bodies (Rajasthan Polity and Administration). Each has the correct answer, and most have an explanation.

When was the Rajasthan Public Service Commission set up?

The Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ordinance, 1949 came into effect on 20 August 1949. The Commission is a constitutional body under Part XIV, and its Chairman and members can be removed only by the President.

Who appoints the State Election Commissioner of Rajasthan?

The Governor, under Article 243K. The State Election Commission was constituted in July 1994 and is responsible for the superintendence, direction and control of elections to Panchayats and Municipalities.

What is the maximum penalty under the RTI Act on an officer?

Rs 250 for each day of delay in providing information, up to a maximum of Rs 25,000. The Information Commission imposes it, and the Public Information Officer must prove that a refusal was justified.