Practice

Statutory Accountability Bodies: RAS Prelims MCQs

78 RAS Prelims MCQs on statutory accountability bodies in Rajasthan cover the Rajasthan Public Service Commission, the State Election Commission, the Rajasthan Information Commission and the State Women Commission. They ask about the constitutional provisions, appointment, removal, powers and penalties of each body, so learn who appoints, who removes and to whom each reports.

Practice questions based on the RPSC RAS Prelims syllabus. They follow the exam pattern but are not past-paper questions.

Clear filters

Showing 1–10 of 78 questions

RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q1. Which part of the Constitution of India deals with the establishment, functions, and independence of the State Public Service Commissions?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q2. Consider the following statements regarding the constitutional basis of the Rajasthan Public Service Commission:
Statement I: Article 315 of the Constitution mandates the creation of a Public Service Commission for the Union and for each State.
Statement II: Two or more states cannot have a Joint Public Service Commission under any circumstance.
Identify the correct option:
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q3. Match List-I (Constitutional Articles) with List- II (Provisions related to State Public Service Commissions):
Constitutional ArticlesProvisions
A. Article 315i. Functions of Public Service Commissions
B. Article 316ii. Removal and suspension of a member of a Public Service Commission
C. Article 317iii. Appointment and term of office of members
D. Article 320iv. Public Service Commissions for the Union and for the States
Select the correct code:
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q4. On which date did the Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ordinance, 1949 come into effect, marking the establishment of the RPSC?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q5. Which of the following statements regarding the inception of the Rajasthan Public Service Commission is incorrect?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q6. Given below are two statements, one labeled as
Assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R):
Assertion (A): Irregularity in consulting the RPSC on a disciplinary matter does not invalidate the final penalty imposed by the government.
Reason (R): The provisions of Article 320(3) regarding consultation with the Commission are directory in nature, not mandatory.
Select the correct answer from the codes given below:
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q7. Which of the following best describes the consequence if the State Government completely fails to consult the RPSC in making rules regarding the method of recruitment to a service?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q8. Who holds the constitutional authority to remove the Chairman or any member of the Rajasthan Public Service Commission?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q9. On which of the following grounds can the President remove a member of the RPSC without making a reference to the Supreme Court for an inquiry?
RAS Prelims Rajasthan Polity and Administration · Statutory Accountability Bodies
Q10. Match List-I (Grounds/Process for Action against RPSC Member) with List-II (Constitutional Provision):
Grounds/Process for Action against RPSC MemberConstitutional Provision
A. Suspension by Governor during inquiryi. Article 317(3)
B. Removal for being adjudged an insolventii. Article 319
C. Removal on ground of misbehavioriii. Article 317(2)
D. Prohibition of holding other employment post-retirementiv. Article 317(1)
Select the correct code:

Answer key for these questions

QCorrect answer
1(b) Part XIV
2(a) Statement I is correct and Statement II is incorrect
3(a) A-iv, B-iii, C-ii, D-i
4(b) 20 August 1949
5(c) The initial composition of the RPSC included a Chairman and five members.
6(a) Both A and R are true and R is the correct explanation of A.
7(d) The rules remain valid as the function of the RPSC is purely advisory.
8(c) The President of India
9(b) Engaging in paid employment outside the duties of their office
10(a) A-iii, B-i, C-iv, D-ii

Key facts from Statutory Accountability Bodies

  • The Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ordinance came into effect on 20 August 1949.
  • The President removes the Chairman or a member of the RPSC, after an inquiry by the Supreme Court on a reference.
  • Article 243K provides for the State Election Commission, which conducts Panchayati Raj elections; the Rajasthan SEC was constituted in July 1994 and its Commissioner is appointed by the Governor.
  • A second appeal to the Information Commission must be made within 90 days; the penalty on an officer is Rs 250 per day, up to Rs 25,000.
  • The burden of proving a denial of information rests on the Public Information Officer.
  • The Rajasthan State Women Commission has a Chairperson, three non-official members and a Member-Secretary.

Frequently asked questions

How many RAS Prelims practice MCQs are there on Statutory Accountability Bodies?

This page has 78 practice MCQs on Statutory Accountability Bodies (Rajasthan Polity and Administration). Each has the correct answer, and most have an explanation.

When was the Rajasthan Public Service Commission set up?

The Rajasthan Public Service Commission Ordinance, 1949 came into effect on 20 August 1949. The Commission is a constitutional body under Part XIV, and its Chairman and members can be removed only by the President.

Who appoints the State Election Commissioner of Rajasthan?

The Governor, under Article 243K. The State Election Commission was constituted in July 1994 and is responsible for the superintendence, direction and control of elections to Panchayats and Municipalities.

What is the maximum penalty under the RTI Act on an officer?

Rs 250 for each day of delay in providing information, up to a maximum of Rs 25,000. The Information Commission imposes it, and the Public Information Officer must prove that a refusal was justified.