| List-I | List-II |
|---|---|
| A. Butler Committee | 1. Jallianwala Bagh Massacre |
| B. Hurtog Committee Report | 2. Relationship between the Indian State and the Paramount Power |
| C. Hunter Inquiry Committee | 3. Working of Dyarchy as laid down in the Report. Montague-Chelmsford Reforms |
| D. Muddiman Committee Report | 4. The growth of education potentialities of its further progress |
Explanation
Butler Committee Report (1927) focused on the relationship between the Indian states and the British Paramount Power. It studied the status and governance of princely states under British rule. Hurtog Committee Report (1929) studied the growth of education in India and its future potential. The committee also emphasized on the role of higher education in producing trained administrative personnel for the British government. Hunter Inquiry Committee Report (1920) investigated the Jallianwala Bagh massacre and its aftermath. The report was criticized for being a whitewashed account of the massacre, as it did not hold Dyer accountable in a meaningful way. The Muddiman Committee Report (1924) examined the working of the dyarchy introduced under the Montagu-Chelmsford Reforms (1919). The committee’s report found that the dyarchy system was not working effectively due to several reasons, such as the lack of real power in the hands of Indian ministers, bureaucratic resistance, etc.