Indian National Movement II (1918-1929): UPSC Previous Year Questions (Modern History)
4 previous year UPSC Prelims questions on Indian National Movement II (1918-1929) (Modern History). Choose an option to see the answer and explanation.
Explanations state facts as of the year each question was asked; words like “recently” refer to that year.
Showing 1–4 of 4 questions
UPSC 2025Modern History · Indian National Movement II (1918-1929)
Q1. Consider the following subjects with regard to Non-Cooperation Programme: I. Boycott of law-courts and foreign cloth II. Observance of strict non-violence III. Retention of titles and honours without using them in public IV. Establishment of Panchayats for settling disputes How many of the above were parts of the Non-Cooperation Programme?
Explanation
In September 1920, at a special session in Calcutta, the Congress approved a non-cooperation programme till the Punjab and Khilafat wrongs were removed and swaraj was established. The programme was to include: boycott of government schools and colleges; boycott of law courts and dispensation of justice through panchayats instead; boycott of legislative councils; (there were some differences over this as some leaders like C.R. Das were not willing to include a boycott of councils, but bowed to Congress discipline; these leaders boycotted elections held in November 1920 and the majority of the voters too stayed away); boycott of foreign cloth and use of khadi instead; also practice of hand-spinning to be done; renunciation(not retention) of government honours and titles; the second phase could include mass civil disobedience including resignation from government service, and non-payment of taxes. During the movement, the participants were supposed to work for Hindu-Muslim unity and for removal of untouchability, all the time remaining non-violent.
UPSC 2025Modern History · Indian National Movement II (1918-1929)
Q2. Consider the following statements in respect of the Non-Cooperation Movement: 1. The Congress declared the attainment of ‘Swaraj’ by all legitimate and peaceful means to be its objective. 2. It was to be implemented in stages with civil disobedience and non-payment of taxes for the next stage only if ‘Swaraj’ did not come within a year and the Government resorted to repression. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
Statement 1 is correct: The Indian National Congress under Mahatma Gandhi’s leadership declared Swaraj (self-rule) as its ultimate objective through the Non-Cooperation Movement (1920-22). The movement emphasized the use of all legitimate and peaceful means such as boycott of British goods, law courts, educational institutions, and titles. The commitment to non-violence and peaceful protest was a foundational principle.
Statement 2 is correct: The strategy of the Non-Cooperation Movement was phased or staged. Gandhi proposed that the movement would initially involve peaceful non-cooperation (boycotts, resignation from government jobs, etc.). If Swaraj was not achieved within a year and if the British government resorted to repression, the next stage would involve more intense actions such as civil disobedience and non-payment of taxes. This conditional phased approach was meant to give the British government a chance to negotiate but also prepared Indians for escalated resistance if necessary.
UPSC 2025Modern History · Indian National Movement II (1918-1929)
Q3. Sedition has become my religion" was the famous statement given by Gandhiji at the time of
Explanation
Mahatma Gandhi made the famous statement "Sedition has become my religion" in 1930 during the Salt Satyagraha while publicly breaking the Salt Law at Dandi as part of the Civil Disobedience Movement. This act of defiance against the British salt monopoly was a turning point in India’s freedom struggle. Gandhi used this phrase to express how opposing unjust laws and British colonial rule had become his moral duty and central to his life’s mission.
UPSC 2025Modern History · Indian National Movement II (1918-1929)
Q4. Who provided legal defence to the people arrested in the aftermath of the Chauri Chaura incident?
Explanation
After the Chauri Chaura incident in 1922, where a mob set fire to a police station killing 22 policemen, many people were arrested and faced trial, with several sentenced to death. Madan Mohan Malaviya, a respected lawyer and freedom fighter, along with Krishna Kant, provided legal defence to these accused individuals. Malaviya’s defence efforts succeeded in getting the death sentences of many of them commuted.
Exam tip:
Chauri Chaura occurred in Gorakhpur, Uttar Pradesh (1922), so legal defence likely came from local lawyer cum leaders. Madan Mohan Malaviya, based in Banaras (UP), was a noted lawyer and nationalist. Krishna Kant was also active in the same region. Others like C.R. Das (Bengal), Jinnah (Bombay), and Kitchlew (Punjab) had no direct association with UP courts. Hence, Option B is the most geographically and logically consistent choice.
Answer key for these questions
Q
UPSC year
Correct answer
1
2025
(c) Only three
2
2025
(c) Both I and II
3
2025
(b) publicly violating Salt Law at Dandi
4
2025
(b) Madan Mohan Malaviya and Krishna Kant
Frequently asked questions
How many previous year UPSC questions are there on Indian National Movement II (1918-1929)?
This page covers 4 previous year UPSC Prelims GS Paper-I questions on Indian National Movement II (1918-1929) (Modern History), asked from 1996 to 2025. Each has the correct answer and an explanation.
How should I use previous year UPSC questions for Prelims?
Attempt each question first, then open the answer and read the explanation for every option. Repeat by chapter, and track which statements UPSC reuses across years. Previous year questions show the exam pattern and difficulty level.
Which years are covered for Indian National Movement II (1918-1929)?
Questions on Indian National Movement II (1918-1929) (Modern History) are available for 18 years, from 1996 to 2025. Use the Year filter to practise a single paper.