A MaargX UPSC Complete Grammar Guide | Rules, Examples & Practice Questions
When we report what someone has said, we can do so in two ways: Direct Speech reproduces the exact words spoken by someone, enclosed within inverted commas (quotation marks). Indirect Speech (also called Reported Speech) conveys the meaning of what was said without quoting the exact words. The words are woven into the sentence of the reporter, and several grammatical changes — in tense, pronouns, time/place adverbials, and sentence structure — take place.
📄 Download PDFWhen we report what someone has said, we can do so in two ways:
| Direct Speech | Indirect Speech |
|---|---|
| She said, "I am happy." | She said that she was happy. |
| He said, "I will come tomorrow." | He said that he would come the next day. |
| "Do you know her?" she asked. | She asked if I knew her. |
Every sentence in reported speech consists of two parts:
The rules for conversion differ based on the type of sentence being reported. There are five main types:
| Direct Tense | Indirect Tense | Direct Example | Indirect Example |
|---|---|---|---|
| Simple Present | Simple Past | "I work here." | He said he worked there. |
| Present Continuous | Past Continuous | "She is sleeping." | He said she was sleeping. |
| Present Perfect | Past Perfect | "They have arrived." | She said they had arrived. |
| Present Perfect Continuous | Past Perfect Continuous | "He has been running." | She said he had been running. |
| Simple Past | Past Perfect | "I met her." | She said she had met her. |
| Past Continuous | Past Perfect Continuous | "We were working." | He said they had been working. |
| Past Perfect | Past Perfect (unchanged) | "She had left." | He said she had left. |
| Simple Future (will) | would | "I will help." | He said he would help. |
| Future Continuous | would + be + -ing | "I will be waiting." | She said she would be waiting. |
| Future Perfect | would + have + PP | "We will have finished." | She said they would have finished. |
| Direct (1st/2nd person) | Indirect (change depends on subject/object of reporting verb) |
|---|---|
| I | he / she (as per subject of reporting verb) |
| me | him / her (as per subject of reporting verb) |
| my | his / her |
| mine | his / hers |
| myself | himself / herself |
| we | they (as per subject of reporting verb) |
| us | them |
| our | their |
| you (as object) | me / us (as per object of reporting verb) |
| you (as subject) | he / she / they (as per object of reporting verb) |
| your | my / our / his / her |
| Direct Speech Adverbial | Indirect Speech Adverbial |
|---|---|
| now | then / at that time |
| today | that day |
| tonight | that night |
| yesterday | the previous day / the day before |
| tomorrow | the next day / the following day |
| last week / month / year | the previous week / the week before |
| next week / month / year | the following week / the next week |
| this | that |
| these | those |
| here | there |
| ago | before / previously |
| thus | so |
| Nature of Imperative | Appropriate Reporting Verb |
|---|---|
| Command / Order | ordered, commanded, directed |
| Request / Appeal | requested, appealed, entreated, implored |
| Advice / Suggestion | advised, suggested, recommended |
| Warning / Caution | warned, cautioned, urged |
| Forbidding / Prohibiting | forbade, prohibited, told … not to |
| Begging / Pleading | begged, beseeched, implored |
| Instruction / Direction | instructed, directed, told |
| Invitation | invited, asked |
| Exclamation Type / Interjection | Reporting Phrase |
|---|---|
| Hurrah! / Bravo! / Hooray! | exclaimed with joy / with delight |
| Alas! / Oh! | exclaimed with sorrow / with grief |
| What a surprise! / Oh! | exclaimed with surprise / with wonder |
| Ugh! / How terrible! | exclaimed with disgust / with horror |
| Well done! / Bravo! | exclaimed with appreciation / applauded |
| "What a + adjective + noun!" | said that it was a very + adjective + noun |
| "How + adjective!" | said that it was very + adjective |
| ✗ INCORRECT | ✓ CORRECT |
|---|---|
| He said me that he was busy. | He told me that he was busy. |
| She asked that where he was going. | She asked where he was going. |
| He asked whether would I come. | He asked whether I would come. |
| She said, "The sun rose in the east." | She said that the sun rises in the east. (universal truth) |
| He told that she was sick. | He said that she was sick. (no object → "said", not "told") |
| He said to me, "Can I help you?" → Indirect: if can he | He asked me if he could help me. (not: if can he) |
| She asked that if he was ready. | She asked if he was ready. (no "that" before "if/whether") |
| He suggested that we go for the walk. | He suggested that we should go for a walk. / He suggested going for a walk. |
| "I had met her" → He said he met her. | "I had met her" → He said he had met her. (past perfect stays) |
| She ordered me that to leave. | She ordered me to leave. (no "that" with imperatives) |
All 15 rules at a glance — one sharp example per rule for rapid revision.
All 60 questions are presented below. Attempt before looking at answers in Part 2.
"Said me" — "said" cannot take an indirect object directly.
Correct FormHe told me that he would come the next day.
Explanation: "Said" must become "told" when followed by a personal object (me, him, her, us, them). "Said to me" → "told me". The tense change (will→would) and adverbial change (tomorrow→next day) are correctly done.
"Asked that whether" — "that" must not precede "if/whether".
Correct FormShe asked me whether he had eaten.
Explanation: The subordinating conjunction for Yes/No questions is either "if" or "whether" — never "that whether". Only one conjunction is used. Also, "asked" is appropriate.
"Moved around" — wrong. This is a universal truth; present tense must be retained.
Correct FormThe teacher said that the earth moves around the sun.
Explanation: Scientific facts and universal truths do not undergo tense backshift even when the reporting verb is past tense. "Moves" must remain in simple present.
"He told that" — "told" requires an object; without one, "said" must be used.
Correct FormHe said that the match had been exciting.
Explanation: "Told" is transitive in reported speech and must be followed by a personal object (told me, told her). Without an object, "said" is correct.
"She asked me that was I ready" — double error: "that" before a question word is wrong; inverted word order is wrong.
Correct FormShe asked me if/whether I was ready.
Explanation: For Yes/No indirect questions: (1) No "that" before "if/whether". (2) Statement order (subject + verb) is required, not question order (verb + subject).
"He is leaving now" — wrong tense and wrong adverbial.
Correct FormHe told them that he was leaving then.
Explanation: The reporting is in past tense ("said"), so the present continuous "is leaving" must shift to past continuous "was leaving". The adverbial "now" must change to "then" as the location and time of reporting differs.
"Said me" — no object without "to"; also, "must" should become "had to".
Correct FormMy mother told me that I had to work hard.
Explanation: "Said to me" → "told me". Pronoun: "you" (2nd person, object of reporting verb "me") → "I". "Must" expressing obligation shifts to "had to" under past reporting.
"Asked that who" — WH- questions take the WH-word directly as conjunction; no "that".
Correct FormShe asked who had done that.
Explanation: "Who" itself serves as the subordinating conjunction in indirect WH-questions. Adding "that" before it is incorrect. The verb "did this" → "had done that" (tense backshift + pronoun change).
"He said that let us celebrate" — this is a suggestion; wrong reporting structure.
Correct FormHe suggested that they should celebrate. / He suggested celebrating.
Explanation: "Let us" expresses a suggestion, so the reporting verb must be "suggested", not "said". The structure must be either "suggested + that + subject + should + V1" or "suggested + gerund (-ing form)".
"Told not to enter" — "told" requires a personal object; here there is none explicitly stated.
Correct FormThe officer ordered them not to enter without permission.
Explanation: When the object is implicit but must appear in indirect speech, it must be stated: "them" (the people addressed). The negative imperative correctly uses "not to + V1". The verb should be "ordered" or "directed", not "told" without an object.
"She said that may God bless me" — optative sentences use "might" in indirect speech.
Correct FormShe prayed that God might bless me.
Explanation: "May" in optative sentences becomes "might" in indirect speech. The reporting verb "said" must become "prayed" or "wished". Pronoun "you" (object = me) → "me". "God" remains unchanged (third person).
"Had already been finishing" — past perfect does not shift to past perfect continuous.
Correct FormHe said that he had already finished the work.
Explanation: Past perfect in direct speech ("had already finished") remains past perfect in indirect speech. It does not shift further to continuous. "Had already been finishing" is grammatically wrong here.
"She said to him that could he help her" — question word order retained wrongly.
Correct FormShe asked him if/whether he could help her.
Explanation: In indirect questions, the word order must be statement order (subject + verb). "Could you" becomes "he could" — not "could he". Also, "said to him" becomes "asked him" for questions. "Can" → "could" under past reporting.
"Was died" — wrong passive construction; "died" is intransitive and cannot form a passive.
Correct FormHe exclaimed with sorrow that his dog had died.
Explanation: "Was died" is a grammatical impossibility. "Die" is intransitive and cannot be used in the passive voice. Also, the past tense "died" shifts to past perfect "had died" under past reporting. Pronoun "my" (subject = he) → "his".
"Will meet" — "shall" under past reporting becomes "would", not "will".
Correct FormHe told her that he would meet her the next day.
Explanation: "Shall" → "would" under tense backshift. "Said to her" → "told her". "I" (subject = he) → "he". "You" (object = her) → "her". "Tomorrow" → "the next day / the following day".
"Can" → "could" under past reporting (reporting verb "said" is past). Option a) "can" would be correct only if the reporting verb were present tense. Option c) "would" implies future intent. Option d) "shall" is a different modal entirely.
"Are you leaving" → "if I was leaving". The present continuous "are…leaving" shifts to past continuous "was…leaving". Option a) "am" — no tense shift, wrong. Option c) "were" — used only in conditional/subjunctive; not standard here. Option d) "had been" — would need past perfect continuous trigger.
Present perfect "have completed" → past perfect "had completed" under past reporting. Option a) retains present perfect — wrong. Option c) simple past "completed" is incorrect — present perfect shifts to past perfect, not simple past. Option d) future — wrong.
Simple past "saw" → past perfect "had seen". Time adverbial "yesterday" → "the previous day / the day before". Option a) wrong tense and adverbial. Option c) "saw" is wrong. Option d) "that day" is used for "today", not "yesterday".
Negative imperative: "Do not open" → "not to open". The reporting verb takes an object, so "said" → "told". Option a) "said" without "to" needs "told". Option c) "to not open" — split infinitive; less acceptable. Option d) "not opening" — gerund is incorrect here.
"May" in optative sentences → "might". Reporting verb for blessings/wishes → "prayed". Option b) "wished / may" — "may" should change to "might". Option c) "said / would" — wrong reporting verb and wrong modal. Option d) "hoped / could" — wrong modal.
Scientific fact (water boiling point) — universal truth; tense stays in present regardless of past reporting verb. Options a) and b) apply incorrect tense backshift. Option d) "would boil" is future — wrong.
"Let us" = suggestion → reporting verb is "suggested". Options a) "told" and b) "ordered" are for imperatives. Option d) "requested" implies asking a favour for oneself — contextually wrong.
"Will not" → "would not" under past reporting. Option a) "will not" — no backshift, wrong. Option c) "shall not" is a different modal. Option d) "could not" changes the meaning entirely.
Present perfect "have kept" → past perfect "had kept". Option a) retains present perfect — wrong. Option c) simple past "kept" — incorrect shift. Option d) past continuous "was keeping" — different aspect and wrong.
"Ought to" does not change in indirect speech (it is a frozen modal). "Should" is also acceptable as an equivalent advisory modal. Both a) "ought to" and b) "should" are grammatically correct reported forms. Option c) "must" would imply obligation rather than advice.
"Hurrah!" expresses joy → "exclaimed with joy". Option a) "sorrow" — wrong emotion. Option c) "surprise" — wrong emotion. Option d) "with pride and that" — grammatically incorrect structure.
In Wh-questions, the WH-word serves as the subordinating conjunction directly. No "if", "that", or "whether" is added. Options a) and d) add unnecessary conjunctions. Option b) "that who" is doubly wrong.
"Could have" is a frozen modal construction — it does not change in indirect speech. Options b) "would have", c) "might have", d) "should have" all change the meaning. The original ability + hypothetical sense of "could have" must be retained.
The adverbial "here" in direct speech changes to "there" in indirect speech when the reporting takes place at a different location. Option a) "here" — no change made, wrong. Options c) and d) are incorrect substitutions.
Why correct: Reporting verb "said" is past → present continuous "am going" shifts to past continuous "was going". Pronoun "I" (subject = he) → "he".
Why others are wrong: a) "is going" — no tense shift despite past reporting verb. c) "told that" — "told" requires a personal object; none is present. d) "said me" — "said" cannot take a direct personal object; must be "told me".
Why correct: "Will" → "would". "You" (object = me/I) → "I". "Me" → "her". Statement order: "I would help" (not "would I"). Conjunction "whether" is correct.
Why others are wrong: a) "will help" — no tense shift. b) "that would I help" — "that" before "whether" is wrong; inverted order wrong. d) "helped" — simple past is wrong; "would help" is correct.
Why correct: Negative imperative: "Do not + V1" → "not to + V1". The teacher gives a warning → "warned" is precise. "Said to the students" → "the students" as object.
Why others are wrong: a) "that do not waste" — imperatives do not use "that" + imperative structure. b) "said the students" — "said" cannot take a personal object here. d) "to not waste" — split infinitive; "not to waste" is the standard form.
Why correct: "What a + adj + noun" → "it was a very + adj + noun". Reporting verb = "exclaimed with admiration". Statement form with "that".
Why others are wrong: a) Retains "what a" — wrong structure in indirect speech. c) "She said" — incorrect reporting verb for exclamations. d) "brilliant very" — adverb placement is wrong.
Why correct: Past perfect "had met" does not shift further — it is already the deepest past tense. "I" (subject = he) → "he". "Her" remains unchanged (third person).
Why others are wrong: a) "met" — simple past is incorrect; past perfect must be retained. b) "had been meeting" — changes the aspect; past perfect continuous is wrong. d) "He told" — without a personal object, "told" is incorrect; "said" is right.
Why correct: "Let us" = suggestion → "suggested that + subject + should + V1". This is the clearest correct form.
Why others are wrong: a) "said that let us" — wrong; direct structure retained; no conversion. b) "proposed that we go" — marginally acceptable but "that we go" without "should" is less standard. d) "said we go" — wrong reporting verb and wrong structure.
Why correct: "Where" acts as subordinating conjunction. Statement order: "I lived" (not "did I live"). Tense: "do live" → "lived" (simple past). "Said to me" → "asked me".
Why others are wrong: a) "where did I live" — question order retained wrongly. c) "that where" — "that" before a WH-word is incorrect. d) "enquired me" — "enquired" is intransitive and cannot take a personal object without "of"; "asked" is better.
Why correct: "May" in optative → "might". Reporting verb → "prayed". "You" (object = me) → "me". "God" unchanged.
Why others are wrong: a) "may God help" — "may" must change to "might"; structure is direct. b) "may help" — still wrong modal. d) "wished God helps" — wrong modal verb form and wrong tense.
Why correct: Option a) "She told me that I should exercise daily" — correct: "said to me" → "told me"; pronoun change; "should" is a frozen modal and stays. Option c) "She advised me to exercise daily" — correct: expressive reporting verb with infinitive structure. Both are grammatically valid.
Why others are wrong: b) "said me" — "said" cannot take a personal object directly.
Why correct: Scientific fact (speed of light) — universal truth → present tense retained regardless of past reporting verb.
Why others are wrong: a) and d) apply incorrect tense backshift to a scientific fact. c) "told that" — without a personal object, "told" is incorrect.
Why correct: "Must" expressing obligation → "had to" under past reporting. "This" → "that". "By evening" → "by that evening". Pronoun "I" → "he".
Why others are wrong: a) "must" — should shift to "had to". c) "told that" — no object present for "told". d) "would finish" — changes meaning to future intention, not obligation.
Why correct: Yes/No question → "if/whether". Tense: "did call" → "had called". "You" (object = me) → "me". Statement order: "she had called me".
Why others are wrong: a) "called" — simple past; "did call" should shift to "had called". b) "had she called" — question order retained wrongly. d) "enquired me" — "enquire" is intransitive and does not take a personal object.
Why correct: "Please + imperative" = request → reporting verb "requested". "Wait" → "to wait". "Said to him" → "him" (object). "Me" → "her" (subject = she).
Why others are wrong: a) "to please wait" — "please" is a politeness marker, not to be retained in indirect speech. c) "told him please wait" — wrong structure; imperatives need infinitive form. d) "that he should wait" — grammatical but "to wait" is standard for requests.
Why correct: "Can" → "could" under past reporting. Pronoun "I" → "he". No other changes needed.
Why others are wrong: a) "can" — no tense shift, wrong. b) "could spoke" — "could" is followed by the base form, not past tense. d) "told that" — no object for "told".
Why correct: "Why" is the subordinating conjunction. Statement order: "she was crying". Tense: "are crying" → "was crying". "You" (object = the child, feminine) → "she".
Why others are wrong: a) "why was she crying" — question order retained wrongly. b) "that why" — "that" before a WH-word is incorrect. d) "if why" — "if" is used only for Yes/No questions, not WH-questions.
Priya told her friends that she was very happy there that day.
Changes made:
1. "Said to her friends" → "told her friends" (said + object → told)
2. "I" → "she" (1st person, subject = Priya, feminine → she)
3. "am happy" → "was happy" (simple present → simple past; past reporting verb)
4. "here" → "there" (place adverbial change)
5. "today" → "that day" (time adverbial change)
6. Inverted commas removed; conjunction "that" added.
Error 1: "has been working" — Reporting verb is "said" (past). Present perfect continuous should shift to past perfect continuous: "had been working".
Error 2: "since two years" — "since" is used with a point in time ("since 2020"), not a duration. For a duration, use "for": "for two years".
CorrectedHe said that he had been working there for two years.
"Do not underestimate your opponents and play with full concentration," the coach said to his team.
Note: "Should not underestimate" → "Do not underestimate" (negative imperative). "Should play" → "Play" (affirmative imperative). "Their opponents" → "your opponents" (pronoun reversal). "Advised" → direct uses imperative form.
Both "if" and "whether" introduce Yes/No indirect questions:
He asked if I was ready. ✓ | He asked whether I was ready. ✓
Only "WHETHER" can be used in these specific situations:
1. Before "or not" in the same clause: She asked whether or not I agreed. (NOT: if or not)
2. After a preposition: The question of whether she would attend was raised. (NOT: if)
3. As the subject of the sentence: Whether he comes is uncertain. (NOT: if)
4. In infinitive constructions: She didn't know whether to stay. (NOT: if)
"If" CANNOT be used in these cases. In straightforward Yes/No indirect questions, both are interchangeable, though "whether" is considered more formal.
Direct: "Come in," said the interviewer. "Take a seat. Have you applied here before? We are looking for experienced professionals. Do not be nervous."
Indirect (all changes labelled)The interviewer asked me to come in [imperative → to-infinitive]. He asked me to take a seat [imperative]. He then enquired whether I had applied there before [Yes/No question: "Have you" → "whether I had"; "here" → "there"]. He added that they were looking for experienced professionals [statement: "are looking" → "were looking"; "We" → "they"]. He also advised me not to be nervous [negative imperative: "Do not be" → "not to be"].
Direct: "Can you help me?" → Indirect: She asked if I could help her. ("can" → "could"; tense backshift)
Direct: "Could you help me?" → Indirect: She asked if I could help her. ("could" remains "could" — frozen modal, no further shift)
The indirect forms appear identical: "…if I could help her." The difference lies in the meaning of the original:
— "Can" asks about present ability → shifts to "could" showing the ability was reported as past.
— "Could" is a more formal/polite request — in indirect speech it remains "could" as a frozen modal.
In many contexts the output is the same, but the grammatical route differs. If preserving the distinction matters, context from the original speaker's intent signals the difference.
She asked him whether he could come the next day. He replied that he would. She told him that she was glad.
Corrections:
1. "Said to him that" + direct speech — mixing direct and indirect is wrong; choose one form.
2. "Can" → "could" (past reporting + tense backshift).
3. "Tomorrow" → "the next day" (time adverbial).
4. "He will" → "he would" ("will" → "would").
5. "She is glad" → "she was glad" (present → past under past reporting).
6. All inverted commas and question marks removed. Conjunctions "whether" and "that" added.
Pronoun changes:
1. "I" (1st person, subject of reporting verb = he) → "he"
2. "myself" (reflexive, 1st person) → "himself" (reflexive matches the new subject "he")
IndirectHe said that he himself had verified every record.
Logic: First-person pronouns always change to match the grammatical person of the subject of the reporting verb. Reflexive pronouns must also shift accordingly. "Myself" → "himself" because the subject is now "he". The emphasis carried by "myself" is preserved by "himself".
(a) He said he worked there. → This is the indirect form of: "I work there." (simple present → simple past under past reporting)
(b) He said he had worked there. → This is the indirect form of: "I worked there." (simple past → past perfect under past reporting)
The distinction is critical:
— Sentence (a) implies that working there is a current fact reported in the past.
— Sentence (b) implies that the working happened before the time of speaking, and is now further in the past.
Using (b) when the original was simple present would imply a completed past action — potentially changing the meaning. This is why careful attention to the original tense is essential before applying backshift.
Both "water freezes at 0°C" and "iron melts at 1538°C" are scientific facts / universal truths. Rule 3 states that universal truths and scientific facts do not undergo tense backshift even when the reporting verb is in the past tense.
Correct Indirect FormThe teacher said that water freezes at 0°C and iron melts at 1538°C.
The tenses must remain in simple present because the facts are eternally true and not dependent on time of reporting.
The principal asked the student why he/she had not informed him.
Labelled components:
— Reporting verb: "asked"
— Reported clause: "why he/she had not informed him" (the entire subordinate clause)
— Subordinating conjunction: "why" (the WH-word itself serves as the conjunction; no "if" or "whether" is added)
Additional changes: "Did you not inform" → "had not informed" (simple past → past perfect; tense backshift) | "You" (object = the student) → "he/she" | "Me" (subject = the principal) → "him" | Question mark dropped; statement order used.
ASSERTIVE (Statement):
Direct: The doctor said to the patient, "You have a mild infection."
Indirect: The doctor told the patient that he/she had a mild infection.
[said to + object → told; tense: have → had; you → he/she]
INTERROGATIVE (Question):
Direct: The doctor asked the patient, "Are you allergic to penicillin?"
Indirect: The doctor asked the patient whether he/she was allergic to penicillin.
[said → asked; Yes/No question → whether; are → was; you → he/she; statement order]
IMPERATIVE (Command/Request):
Direct: The doctor said to the patient, "Take this medicine twice a day."
Indirect: The doctor instructed the patient to take that medicine twice a day.
[said to → instructed; imperative → to-infinitive; this → that]
This scenario shows how the same speaker's words require three completely different conversion strategies based on sentence type.
Indirect (complex): She warned him not to touch the live wire, asked why he was working alone, and suggested that he should wait for the electrician.
Direct Speech Reconstruction"Do not touch the live wire. Why are you working alone? Wait for the electrician."
Breakdown:
1. "warned him not to touch" → Direct: "Do not touch the live wire." (negative imperative; "warned" signals caution)
2. "asked why he was working alone" → Direct: "Why are you working alone?" (WH-question; tense reverse: was working → are working; he → you)
3. "suggested that he should wait" → Direct: "Wait for the electrician." or "You should wait for the electrician." (suggestion with should → advisory)
"Should have" is a modal perfect construction. "Should" itself is a frozen modal (it does not shift further in indirect speech). "Have" in "should have" is part of the modal perfect structure (modal + have + past participle) — it does not shift independently.
So the construction "should have + past participle" stays intact in indirect speech. In this sense, the candidate is correct that the form does not change.
However, the reasoning is incomplete: it is not merely that "should" is frozen — it is that the entire modal perfect construction "should have + past participle" is already at the furthest point of past reference and cannot shift further back. The proper rule is: "modal + have + past participle is never further shifted."
Conclusion: The form in the sentence is correct, but the rule must be stated precisely.
Both students are partially right. The complete rule resolves the disagreement:
"Must" has two distinct meanings, and the indirect speech treatment differs:
1. OBLIGATION / DUTY (must = have to): "Must" → "had to" when reporting obligation under a past reporting verb.
"You must submit the form today." → He said I had to submit the form that day.
2. LOGICAL NECESSITY / DEDUCTION (must = certainly is): "Must" remains "must" (no change) when expressing logical inference.
"He must be tired after such a long journey." → She said he must be tired after such a long journey.
3. PROHIBITION (must not): "Must not" → "must not" (retained) when expressing prohibition (a standing rule or law).
"You must not cheat in the examination." → The invigilator warned that students must not cheat.
Student A is correct for Category 1 (obligation). Student B is correct for Categories 2 and 3. Neither student's claim covers all cases. The complete picture requires distinguishing the semantic function of "must" before applying a rule.
Let’s guide your chariot to LBSNAA