Federal System with a Unitary Bias
Indian Polity › Salient Features of the Constitution · Topic 3.3
The Constitution establishes a federal system but contains many unitary features that tilt the balance towards the Centre. Article 1 calls India a Union of States. Scholars call it quasi-federal, bargaining or co-operative federalism, and the Bommai case calls federalism a basic feature.
6 min read · UPSC Prelims · Polity · Salient Features
At a Glance
- What it is The Constitution establishes a federal system but contains many unitary or non-federal features that tilt the balance towards the Centre
- Article 1 Describes India as a “Union of States”; the word “Federation” is nowhere used
- Common descriptions “Federal in form but unitary in spirit”; quasi-federal (Wheare); bargaining federalism (Morris Jones); co-operative federalism (Austin); federation with a centralising tendency (Jennings)
- Two causes of the unitary bias (K. Santhanam) The Centre’s dominance in finance, and the powerful erstwhile Planning Commission
- Supreme Court In the Bommai case (1994): federalism is a basic feature, and the states are not satellites or agents of the Centre
- Exam link UPSC Prelims, Polity: Salient Features
Where Does It Fit?
A previous topic listed the federal and unitary features in full. This topic presents the same idea as a salient feature of the Constitution: a federal system with a unitary bias. It keeps the short lists, the labels given by scholars and the Supreme Court’s position.
What Is Federal and What Is Unitary?
The Constitution of India establishes a federal system of government. It contains all the usual features of a federation: two governments, division of powers, a written Constitution, supremacy of the Constitution, rigidity of the Constitution, an independent judiciary and bicameralism.
However, it also contains many unitary or non-federal features: a strong Centre, a single Constitution, single citizenship, flexibility of the Constitution, an integrated judiciary, appointment of the state Governor by the Centre, all-India services and emergency provisions, among others.
The term federation has nowhere been used in the Constitution. Article 1 describes India as a Union of States, which implies two things: first, the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement by the states; second, no state has the right to secede from the federation.
What Labels Have Scholars Given It?
| Who | Label |
|---|---|
| Common description | Federal in form but unitary in spirit |
| K.C. Wheare | Quasi-federal; a unitary state with subsidiary federal features rather than a federal state with subsidiary unitary features |
| K. Santhanam | India has practically functioned as a unitary state, though the Union and the states have tried to function formally as a federation |
| Paul Appleby | Extremely federal |
| Morris Jones | Bargaining federalism |
| Ivor Jennings | A federation with a strong centralising tendency; mainly federal with unique safeguards for enforcing national unity and growth |
| Alexandrowicz | A case sui generis, unique in character |
| Granville Austin | Co-operative federalism |
What Increased the Unitary Bias?
According to K. Santhanam, two factors have been responsible for increasing the unitary bias, that is, the tendency of centralisation.
- The dominance of the Centre in the financial sphere and the dependence of the states upon Central grants.
- The emergence of a powerful erstwhile Planning Commission, which controlled the developmental process in the states.
What Did Ambedkar and the Supreme Court Say?
Dr. B.R. Ambedkar told the Constituent Assembly that the Constitution is federal because it establishes a dual polity, with the Union and the states both created by the Constitution and both deriving their authority from it. He added that the Constitution avoids the tight mould of federalism and could be both unitary and federal according to the requirements of time and circumstances.
In the Bommai case (1994), the Supreme Court laid down that the Constitution is federal and that federalism is its basic feature. It said that the greater power conferred on the Centre does not make the states mere appendages, that the states have an independent constitutional existence and are not satellites or agents of the Centre, and that the overriding of their powers during an emergency and in certain other eventualities is an exception and not a rule.
Federalism in India represents a compromise between two conflicting considerations: the normal division of powers, under which the states enjoy autonomy within their own spheres, and the need for national integrity and a strong Union government under exceptional circumstances.
Why Is This Topic Important?
- The central question on Indian federalism: It asks whether India is federal or unitary, and the answer given is a combination.
- Labels are Prelims material: Matching scholars with their descriptions is a direct question type.
- Basic-structure link: The Supreme Court treats federalism as a basic feature.
What Came Next?
The next topic takes up the parliamentary form of government as a salient feature of the Constitution.
Key People and Terms
- Union of States Article 1; the federation is not the result of an agreement among the states, and no state can secede
- K.C. Wheare Quasi-federal
- K. Santhanam Identified two causes of the unitary bias
- Morris Jones Bargaining federalism
- Granville Austin Co-operative federalism
- Bommai case (1994) Federalism is a basic feature
Exam Corner
Points to Remember
- Article 1: Union of States; “Federation” is not used.
- Wheare: quasi-federal. Morris Jones: bargaining federalism. Austin: co-operative federalism. Jennings: federation with a strong centralising tendency. Appleby: extremely federal. Alexandrowicz: sui generis.
- Santhanam’s two factors: Centre’s financial dominance and the Planning Commission.
- Bommai (1994): federalism is a basic feature.
Do Not Confuse With
- Quasi-federal and extremely federal: Wheare called it quasi-federal; Appleby called it extremely federal.
- Bargaining and co-operative federalism: Morris Jones used the first; Granville Austin used the second.
- Union and Federation: Article 1 says Union, because the states did not form it by agreement and cannot secede.
Memory Hook
Federal in form, unitary in spirit: Wheare quasi, Jones bargains, Austin cooperates, Appleby says extremely federal.
Mains Angle
The question is usually whether Indian federalism is real. Use these points to add depth.
- Two views: Wheare and Santhanam saw a unitary state in practice, while Appleby, Jennings and Austin stressed federal or co-operative character.
- Ambedkar’s reply: The Constitution partitions legislative and executive authority itself, and the Centre cannot alter the boundary of the partition by its own will, nor can the judiciary.
- Financial and planning dominance: Santhanam traced the bias to the Centre’s finances and the Planning Commission.
- The Court’s view: Greater power for the Centre does not make the states agents of the Centre.
- A compromise: Federalism in India balances state autonomy with national integrity.
A Question You May Face
An original practice question, not a past paper question.
“Indian federalism is federal in form but unitary in spirit.” Critically examine.
How to Answer
- Introduction: Article 1 describes India as a Union of States; the Constitution has federal features and unitary features.
- Arguments for the unitary view: Wheare’s quasi-federalism and Santhanam’s two factors.
- Arguments for the federal view: Appleby, Jennings, Austin, Ambedkar and the Bommai case.
- Conclusion: Indian federalism is a compromise between state autonomy and a strong Union under exceptional circumstances.
GS Relevance
Frequently Asked Questions
What does federal system with a unitary bias mean?
It means the Constitution establishes a federal system, with two governments, division of powers and an independent judiciary, but also has many unitary features, such as a strong Centre, single citizenship and emergency provisions, which tilt the balance of power towards the Centre.
Why does the Constitution use the term Union of States?
Article 1 describes India as a Union of States, which implies that the Indian federation is not the result of an agreement by the states and that no state has the right to secede. The word federation is nowhere used in the Constitution.
Who called the Indian Constitution quasi-federal?
K.C. Wheare called it quasi-federal. He remarked that the Indian Union is a unitary state with subsidiary federal features rather than a federal state with subsidiary unitary features. Other scholars have used different labels, such as bargaining federalism or co-operative federalism.
What are the other descriptions of Indian federalism?
Paul Appleby called it extremely federal, Morris Jones bargaining federalism, Ivor Jennings a federation with a strong centralising tendency, Alexandrowicz a case sui generis, and Granville Austin co-operative federalism. It is also described as federal in form but unitary in spirit.
What two factors increased the unitary bias according to Santhanam?
K. Santhanam named two factors: the dominance of the Centre in the financial sphere, with the states dependent on Central grants, and the emergence of a powerful erstwhile Planning Commission that controlled the developmental process in the states.
What did the Supreme Court say about federalism in the Bommai case?
In the Bommai case of 1994 the Supreme Court laid down that the Constitution is federal and that federalism is its basic feature. The states are not satellites or agents of the Centre, and the overriding of their powers in emergencies is an exception.
How did Ambedkar describe the Indian Constitution?
Ambedkar said the Constitution is federal in that it establishes a dual polity, with both the Union and the states created by the Constitution. He added that it avoids the tight mould of federalism and could be both unitary and federal according to the requirements of time and circumstances.
What two considerations does Indian federalism balance?
Indian federalism is a compromise between two conflicting considerations: the normal division of powers, under which states enjoy autonomy within their own spheres, and the need for national integrity and a strong Union government under exceptional circumstances.
PYQ Practice — Statement Analysis
1 K.C. Wheare described the Indian Constitution as quasi-federal.
He said it is a unitary state with subsidiary federal features.
2 Granville Austin described Indian federalism as bargaining federalism.
Austin called it co-operative federalism. Morris Jones used the term bargaining federalism.
3 The word Federation is used in Article 1 of the Constitution to describe India.
Article 1 describes India as a Union of States. The term federation is nowhere used in the Constitution.
4 K. Santhanam attributed the unitary bias to the Centre's financial dominance and the erstwhile Planning Commission.
He said India has practically functioned as a unitary state.
5 In the Bommai case (1994), the Supreme Court held that federalism is a basic feature of the Constitution.
It said the states are not satellites or agents of the Centre.
Related Topics
Browse the full Indian Polity index