Anglo-Sikh Wars and Doctrine of Lapse: RAS Prelims MCQs
31 RAS Prelims MCQs on the Anglo-Sikh wars and the Doctrine of Lapse deal with Maharaja Ranjit Singh’s rise, his army and administration, the succession after him and the two wars with the British. The questions ask about misls, the Fauj-i-Khas, the causes of the Second Anglo-Sikh War and the annexations under the Doctrine of Lapse.
Practice questions based on the RPSC RAS Prelims syllabus. They follow the exam pattern but are not past-paper questions.
Showing 21–30 of 31 questions
Explanation
The Battle of Gujrat, occurring in February 1849, is famously known as the Battle of Guns because of the unprecedented and intensive use of heavy artillery by both sides. This was the final and decisive battle of the Second Anglo-Sikh War. The British artillery eventually overwhelmed the Sikh and Afghan forces, leading to their unconditional surrender and the annexation of Punjab.Explanation
Lord Hugh Gough was the Commander-in-Chief who led the British forces during the Anglo-Sikh wars, but he was not a member of the Board of Administration. Following the annexation of Punjab in 1849, Lord Dalhousie established a three-member board consisting of Henry Lawrence, John Lawrence, and Charles Mansel to oversee the transition to direct British civil and political governance.I. The Battle of Gujrat proved to be the final and decisive battle.
II. Punjab was formally annexed to the British Empire in 1849.
III. Maharaja Dalip Singh was granted a pension and sent to England.
IV. The famous Koh-i-Noor diamond was taken away and presented to the British Crown.
V. The Khalsa army was fully integrated into the British military without any disbandment.
Which of the following statement(s) is/are correct?
Explanation
After the Battle of Gujrat, Punjab was annexed in 1849. Maharaja Dalip Singh was pensioned off to England, and the Koh-i-Noor diamond was surrendered to the British Crown. Crucially, the Khalsa army was completely disbanded rather than integrated. This policy aimed to eliminate any potential military threat to the new administration while asserting total British control over the former Sikh territories.Explanation
In 1853, Lord Dalhousie abolished the three-member Board of Administration in Punjab due to internal disagreements between the Lawrence brothers. John Lawrence was subsequently appointed as the first Chief Commissioner of the province. This change centralized administrative authority, moving away from a collective leadership model toward a more efficient, single-headed bureaucracy to manage the newly annexed and strategically vital territory.Explanation
The fundamental legal premise of the Doctrine of Lapse was that while an adopted heir could inherit the private property of a deceased ruler, they had no automatic right to inherit political sovereignty or the throne. In dependent states, the British, as the paramount power, reserved the right to grant or withhold consent for such successions, leading to territorial annexation.| State | Year of Annexation |
|---|---|
| A. Satara | i. 1854 |
| B. Jaitpur | ii. 1849 |
| C. Jhansi | iii. 1848 |
| D. Nagpur | iv. 1853 |
Explanation
Under the Doctrine of Lapse, Satara was the first to be annexed in 1848, followed by Jaitpur and Sambalpur in 1849. Jhansi was brought under direct British rule in 1853 after the death of its ruler without a natural heir. Finally, Nagpur was annexed in 1854, significantly expanding British territory in central India and securing valuable cotton-growing regions.Statement I: It was strictly applicable only to dependent states that had been created or revived by British grants.
Statement II: It was indiscriminately applied to all independent allied states of the British East India Company.
Choose the correct option:
Explanation
The Doctrine of Lapse was theoretically applicable only to dependent states--those created or revived by British grants and therefore subordinate to the East India Company. It was not intended for truly independent allied states. However, Lord Dalhousie often applied the principle broadly to any state where the ruler died without a direct male heir, leading to frequent and controversial annexations.Explanation
The British classified native states into three categories regarding the right of adoption. For the first category, consisting of independent states that were never subordinate to any paramount power, no British consent was required for a valid political adoption. However, very few states truly fell into this category, as most had entered into subsidiary or subordinate relationships with the Company.Explanation
Although Lord Dalhousie is most associated with the Doctrine of Lapse, the principle was first articulated by the Court of Directors of the East India Company in 1834. They stated that the permission to adopt should be treated as an indulgence rather than a right and should be granted only on special occasions, providing a legal precedent for later aggressive annexations.Answer key for these questions
| Q | Correct answer |
|---|---|
| 21 | (d) An indecisive battle resulting in extremely heavy casualties for the British forces. |
| 22 | (c) Battle of Gujrat |
| 23 | (b) Lord Hugh Gough |
| 24 | (a) I, II, III, and IV only |
| 25 | (a) The Board of Administration was abolished, and John Lawrence was appointed as the first Chief Commissioner. |
| 26 | (c) Recognition that heirs could inherit property but required British consent to inherit political rights. |
| 27 | (a) A-iii, B-ii, C-iv, D-i |
| 28 | (a) Statement I is correct and Statement II is incorrect. |
| 29 | (b) Independent states that were never subordinate to a paramount power. |
| 30 | (c) The Court of Directors of the East India Company in 1834. |
Key facts from Anglo-Sikh Wars and Doctrine of Lapse
- Ranjit Singh belonged to the Sukerchakia Misl and captured Lahore from the Bhangi Misl in 1799.
- He was recognised as governor of Lahore after returning Zaman Shah’s lost cannons.
- Fauj-i-Khas was the elite, European-trained regular brigade of the Khalsa army.
- The order of succession after Ranjit Singh was Kharak Singh, Nau Nihal Singh, Sher Singh and Dalip Singh.
- The revolt of Diwan Mulraj at Multan and the murder of two British officers set off the Second Anglo-Sikh War; the Battle of Gujrat is called the Battle of Guns.
- In the Second Anglo-Sikh War the Sikhs allied with the Afghans under Dost Mohammad Khan.
Frequently asked questions
How many RAS Prelims practice MCQs are there on Anglo-Sikh Wars and Doctrine of Lapse?
This page has 31 practice MCQs on Anglo-Sikh Wars and Doctrine of Lapse (Modern Indian History). Each has the correct answer, and most have an explanation.
To which misl did Ranjit Singh belong?
The Sukerchakia Misl. From this base he united the Sikh misls and captured Lahore from the Bhangi Misl in 1799, going on to build the Sikh empire of the Punjab.
What was the Fauj-i-Khas?
The elite regular brigade of Ranjit Singh’s Khalsa army, trained on European lines by officers such as Ventura and Allard. It was meant to be a disciplined, modern force, apart from the traditional Sikh cavalry.
What triggered the Second Anglo-Sikh War?
The rebellion of Diwan Mulraj at Multan and the murder of two British officers there. The unrest spread, and the Sikhs were finally defeated at the Battle of Gujrat, after which the Punjab was annexed in 1849.