Maurya and Post-Maurya Dynasties: RAS Prelims MCQs
80 RAS Prelims MCQs on the Maurya and post-Maurya dynasties ask about rulers, edicts, officials and sources. Chandragupta Maurya and the Arthashastra, Bindusara, the Kalinga War, Ashoka’s Dhamma, Megasthenes and the Mauryan economy appear alongside the Kushans and Satavahanas, and the explanations tie each fact to its source.
Practice questions based on the RPSC RAS Prelims syllabus. They follow the exam pattern but are not past-paper questions.
Showing 41–50 of 80 questions
Explanation
While Ashoka adopted the policy of non-violence, historical evidence does not support the claim that he completely disbanded the Mauryan army. A massive standing military remained necessary to maintain order across the vast empire. Modern historians generally attribute the decline to other factors, such as the highly centralized bureaucracy, financial strain from heavy state spending, and the oppressive rule of provincial governors in regions far from the capital.| Scholar | Proposed theory for Mauryan decline |
|---|---|
| A. Haraprasad Shastri | i. Economic crisis and debasement of currency |
| B. H.C. Raychaudhuri | ii. Brahminic reaction against Ashoka’s policies |
| C. D.D. Kosambi | iii. Highly centralized administration and weak successors |
| D. Romila Thapar | iv. Ashoka’s pacifist policies weakening the military |
Explanation
Various scholars have proposed different theories for the Mauryan collapse. Haraprasad Shastri focused on the Brahminic reaction against Ashokan policies. H.C. Raychaudhuri argued that Ashoka’s pacifism weakened the military’s fighting spirit. D.D. Kosambi highlighted an economic crisis evidenced by the debasement of currency. Romila Thapar emphasized the inherent weaknesses of a highly centralized administration which failed when faced with incompetent successors.Explanation
Brihadratha was the final monarch of the Mauryan dynasty. His reign came to a violent end around 185 BCE when he was assassinated during a military parade by his own commander-in-chief, Pushyamitra Sunga. This coup marked the definitive collapse of the Mauryan Empire and the rise of the Sunga dynasty. The event reflected the internal instability and loss of control that characterized the later years of Mauryan rule.I. The empire was partitioned, with the eastern part going to Pushyamitra Sunga.
II. The north-western gateways were left vulnerable to Indo-Greek incursions.
III. The Satavahanas immediately replaced the Mauryas in Pataliputra.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Explanation
Following the collapse of the Mauryan Empire, the eastern territories came under the control of Pushyamitra Sunga, who founded the Sunga dynasty. The weakening of central authority also left the North-Western frontier vulnerable to invasions by Indo-Greek rulers. However, the Satavahanas did not immediately replace the Mauryas in Pataliputra; they rose to prominence in the Deccan and Central India, rather than in the Magadhan heartland.Explanation
The Ayodhya inscription provides evidence that Pushyamitra Sunga, the founder of the Sunga dynasty, performed the Ashvamedha or horse sacrifice twice during his reign. This Vedic ritual was a powerful symbol of imperial sovereignty and the restoration of Brahmanical traditions after the Mauryan period. His performance of these sacrifices signifies his military successes against various enemies, including the Indo- Greeks, and his role as a patron of orthodox Vedic practices.Explanation
Patanjali is a renowned literary and grammatical figure associated with the Sunga period, specifically during the reign of Pushyamitra Sunga. He authored the Mahabhashya, a profound commentary on Panini’s Sanskrit grammar. His work is historically significant as it reflects the revival of Sanskrit scholarship and Vedic culture under Sunga patronage. Patanjali is also traditionally credited with officiating as the priest during the Ashvamedha sacrifices performed by the Sunga monarch.Assertion (A) and the other as Reason (R).
Assertion (A): Later Buddhist traditions portray Pushyamitra Sunga as a cruel persecutor of Buddhism.
Reason (R): Archaeological evidence firmly proves that all Buddhist stupas at Sanchi and Bharhut were completely destroyed during the Sunga period.
Explanation
Later Buddhist texts like the Ashokavadana describe Pushyamitra Sunga as a hostile persecutor of Buddhism who destroyed monasteries. However, archaeological evidence from Sanchi and Bharhut contradicts the claim of total destruction. In fact, significant renovations and additions were made to these Buddhist stupas during the Sunga period, suggesting a more complex relationship where the state may have patronized these religious sites despite the king’s personal dedication to Brahmanical traditions.Statement I: The Kanva dynasty was founded by Vasudeva after he overthrew the last Sunga king, Devabhuti.
Statement II: The Kanvas ruled over a vast empire that included the entire Deccan peninsula.
Which of the following is correct?
Explanation
The Kanva dynasty was established by Vasudeva Kanva, who seized power after killing Devabhuti, the last Sunga king. While they successfully established their authority in Magadha, their empire was significantly smaller than that of the Mauryas or early Sungas. The Kanvas did not rule over the entire Deccan; that region was primarily under the control of the rising Satavahana dynasty, which eventually contributed to the final downfall of the Kanvas.I. The Sunga capital remained at Pataliputra, though Vidisha gained prominence.
II. The famous Indo-Greek king Menander invaded India during this period.
III. Agnimitra, a Sunga prince, is the protagonist of a famous play by Kalidasa.
IV. The Sungas replaced Sanskrit with Prakrit as the official court language.
Which of the above statements is/are correct?
Explanation
During the Sunga period, Vidisha became a major political center alongside the traditional capital at Pataliputra. This era witnessed invasions by Indo- Greek kings, including the famous Menander. The Sunga prince Agnimitra is celebrated as the hero in Kalidasa’s play Malavikagnimitram. Contrary to shifting to Prakrit, the Sunga period was actually marked by a significant revival of Sanskrit as the language of the royal court and high intellectual discourse.Answer key for these questions
| Q | Correct answer |
|---|---|
| 41 | (c) Ashoka’s pro-Buddhist policies which triggered a strong Brahminic reaction. |
| 42 | (a) Ashoka’s total disbandment of the army out of extreme pacifism. |
| 43 | (a) A-ii, B-iv, C-i, D-iii |
| 44 | (b) Brihadratha |
| 45 | (a) I and II only |
| 46 | (d) Ashvamedha |
| 47 | (a) Patanjali - Mahabhashya |
| 48 | (c) A is true but R is false. |
| 49 | (a) Statement I is correct and Statement II is incorrect. |
| 50 | (c) I, II, and III only |
Key facts from Maurya and Post-Maurya Dynasties
- Chandragupta Maurya overthrew the Nanda dynasty and founded the Maurya Empire.
- Bindusara was called Amitrochates (slayer of foes) by the Greeks; the Syrian king Antiochus I sent Deimachus to his court.
- The Kalinga War was fought in the eighth year of Ashoka’s reign.
- Ashoka appointed Dhamma-mahamattas to spread Dhamma and look after the welfare of the people.
- The Maski Minor Rock Edict names Ashoka; the Bhabru-Bairat Edict in Rajasthan shows his faith in Buddhism.
- Dharmasthiya and Kantakashodhana were the civil and criminal courts of the Mauryan administration.
Frequently asked questions
How many RAS Prelims practice MCQs are there on Maurya and Post-Maurya Dynasties?
This page has 80 practice MCQs on Maurya and Post-Maurya Dynasties (Ancient Indian History). Each has the correct answer, and most have an explanation.
Which Ashokan edict names Ashoka?
The Maski Minor Rock Edict. In most edicts Ashoka calls himself Devanampiya Piyadasi, but the Maski edict gives his personal name Ashoka, which makes it a key source for identifying the Piyadasi of the edicts with Ashoka.
What were Dhamma-mahamattas?
Special officials created by Ashoka to spread the code of Dhamma and to look after the welfare of people of all sects. They are mentioned in his edicts and show how he made moral policy part of administration.
What were Dharmasthiya and Kantakashodhana?
Dharmasthiya courts handled civil cases and Kantakashodhana courts handled criminal cases, as described in the Arthashastra. Together they show how the Mauryan state separated civil disputes from the removal of thorns, meaning crimes against the state.