13 previous year UPSC Prelims questions on Polity in the UPSC 2025 Prelims. Choose an option to see the answer and explanation.
Explanations state facts as of the year each question was asked; words like “recently” refer to that year.
Showing 1–10 of 13 questions
Browse Polity chapters
UPSC 2025Polity · Non-Constitutional Bodies
Q1. With reference to the Government of India, consider the following information:
Organization
Some of its functions
It works under
I. Directorate of Enforcement
Enforcement of the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018
Internal Security Division-I, Ministry of Home Affairs
II. Directorate of Revenue Intelligence
Enforces the Provisions of the Customs Act, 1962
Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance
III. Directorate General of Systems and Data Management
Carrying out big data analytics to assist tax officers for better policy and nabbing tax evaders
Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance
In how many of the above rows is the information correctly matched?
Explanation
Row I is not matched: The Directorate of Enforcement (ED) is a specialized economic intelligence and law enforcement agency under the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance (not Ministry of Home Affairs). It enforces laws like the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) and the Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA). While the Fugitive Economic Offenders Act, 2018 is also enforced by the ED, it does not work under the Internal Security Division-I of the Ministry of Home Affairs. Row II is matched: The DRI is the premier anti-smuggling agency responsible for enforcing the Customs Act, 1962, and functions under the Department of Revenue, Ministry of Finance. Row III is incorrectly matched: The Directorate General of Analytics and Risk Management (DGARM) has been set up, w.e.f. 01-07-2018, to provide intelligence inputs and carry out big data analytics to assist the tax officers for better policy formulation and nabbing evaders. The DGARM functions under the Central Board of Indirect Tax and Customs (CBIC), mainly to use internal and external sources for detailed data mining to generate actionable inputs. The DGARM is an attached office of the CBIC which reports to Chairman, CBIC through Member (Investigation). This Directorate General functions for Customs, Central Excise and Goods and Services Tax. The DGARM works in close coordination with Directorate General of Systems and Data Management, Directorate General of Revenue Intelligence, Directorate General of Goods and Services Tax Intelligence, Directorate General of Audit and Directorate General of Valuation. The DGARM utilizes internal and external data sources for detailed data mining and analysis to generate outputs for focused and targeted action by field formations and investigation wings of CBIC. It in conjunction with DG Systems, organize, evaluate and interpret data for the purposes of effective, efficient and targeted policy formulation and revenue administration.
UPSC 2025Polity · Local Government: Panchayats and Municipalities
Q2. Consider the following statements: I. Panchayats at the intermediate level exist in all States. II. To be eligible to be a Member of a Panchayat at the intermediate level, a person should attain the age of thirty years. III. The Chief Minister of a State constitutes a commission to review the financial position of Panchayats at the intermediate levels and to make recommendations regarding the distribution of net proceeds of taxes and duties, leviable by the State, between the State and Panchayats at the intermediate level. Which of the statements given above are not correct?
Explanation
Statement 1 is incorrect: As per Article 243B Panchayats at the intermediate level may not be constituted in a State having a population not exceeding twenty lakhs. So, the states which have a population below 20 Lakh are given an option to not to have the intermediate level.At present, States of Arunachal Pradesh, Goa, Sikkim and Union Territories of Lakshadweep, Dadra & Nagar Haveli and Daman & Diu have two-tier Panchayati Raj System.
Statement 2 is incorrect: Article 243F makes provisions for disqualifications from the membership of Panchayat. Under Article 243F, the minimum age prescribed to become a member of the Panchayat is 21 years.
Statement 3 is incorrect: Article 243I provides for the Constitution of a Finance Commission to review the financial position of the panchayats. Such a Finance Commission is constituted by the Governor.
Exam tip:
For S1, the phrase "All states" is too absolute to be true to be implemented practically. Hence likely false. For S2, 30 years minimum age! It can be negated from real life examples around you. Even MLA’s minimum age is 25, having more than this is a practical violation of the principle of decentralization. Hence likely false. S3 aligns with Function-person/organisation/ministry match trap as its easy to manipulate to make it false. CM vs Governor.
UPSC 2025Polity · Non-Constitutional Bodies
Q3. Consider the following statements about Lokpal: I. The power of Lokpal applies to public servants of India, but not to the Indian public servants posted outside India. II. The Chairperson or a Member shall not be a Member of the Parliament or a Member of the Legislature of any State or Union Territory, and only the Chief Justice of India, whether incumbent or retired, has to be its Chairperson. III. The Chairperson or a Member shall not be a person of less than forty-five years of age on the date of assuming office as the Chairperson or Member, as the case may be. IV. Lokpal cannot inquire into the allegations of corruption against a sitting Prime Minister of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 provides for the establishment of a body of Lokpal for the Union. Statement 1 is incorrect: The Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 2013 shall apply to public servants in and outside India. Thus, the Lokpal has jurisdiction over all public servants, whether posted in India or abroad.
Statement 2 is incorrect: Section 3 of the Lokpal Act says that the Chairperson or a Member of Lokpal shall not be a member of Parliament or a member of the Legislature of any State or Union territory. It also provides that the Lokpal shall consist of a Chairperson, who is or has been a Chief Justice of India or is or has been a Judge of the Supreme Court or an eminent person.
Statement 3 is correct: As per Section 3 of the Lokpal Act, the Chairperson or a Member shall not be a person of less than forty-five years of age, on the date of assuming office as the Chairperson or Member, as the case may be.
Statement 4 is incorrect: As per Section 14 of the Lokpal Act, the jurisdiction of the Lokpal extends to any person who is or has been a Prime Minister. However, there are exceptions here. There are certain cases in which Lokpal shall not inquire into any matter involving the Prime Minister.
UPSC 2025Polity · President
Q4. Consider the following statements with regard to pardoning power of the President of India: I. The exercise of this power by the President can be subjected to limited judicial review. II. The President can exercise this power without the advice of the Central Government. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
Statement 1 is correct: While the President’s pardoning power is broad, it is not absolute. The Supreme Court has held that judicial review is permissible if the decision is arbitrary, mala fide, or based on irrelevant considerations (e.g., political favoritism). In the landmark case of Maru Ram v. Union of India (1980) it was established that courts can intervene if constitutional principles are violated.
Statement 2 is incorrect: In the Maru Ram v. Union of India case, the Supreme Court made it clear that the President’s power to grant pardons under Article 72 is an executive responsibility and must be carried out based on the advice of the Council of Ministers, as required by Article 74. The President does not have the authority to use this power independently.
Exam tip:
For S1, it is a well known fact that "everything" is under Judicial review in India, hence S1 is likely true too. For S2, In India, no discretionary power exists for the President unless the Constitution explicitly says so. Since Article 72 has no such exception, the Council’s advice is mandatory. Hence likely false.
UPSC 2025Polity · Parliament
Q5. Consider the following statements: I. On the dissolution of the House of the People, the Speaker shall not vacate his/her office until immediately before the first meeting of the House of the People after the dissolution. II. According to the provisions of the Constitution of India, a Member of the House of the People on being elected as Speaker shall resign from his/her political party Immediately. III. The Speaker of the House of the People may be removed from his/her office by a resolution of the House of the People passed by a majority of all the then Members of the House, provided that no resolution shall be moved unless at least fourteen days’ notice has been given of the intention to move the resolution. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation
Statement 1 is correct: As per Article 94 of the Indian constitution, the Speaker of the House continues in office until the first meeting of the newly constituted Lok Sabha after dissolution.
Statement 2 is incorrect: The Constitution does not mandate the Speaker to resign from their political party. While parliamentary conventions encourage neutrality on part of the Speaker of the House, this is not a constitutional requirement.
Statement 3 is correct: Article 94 of the Indian Constitution addresses the process for removing the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. It states that the Speaker may be removed through a resolution supported by a majority of the current members of the House, provided that at least 14 days’ notice is given before moving the resolution.
Exam tip:
For S2,"According to the provisions of the Constitution..." This is a strong claim. Any such rule must be explicitly stated in the text of the Constitution, not by convention or practice. Multiple real-life examples--like Om Birla and Sumitra Mahajan--prove that Speakers have continued as party members during their tenure. Also, it uses strong absolute language: "shall resign... immediately" and attributes it to the Constitution -- this makes it factually and logically incorrect. Giving option C as correct.
UPSC 2025Polity · Parliament
Q6. Consider the following statements: I. If any question arises as to whether a Member of the House of the People has become subject to disqualification under the 10th Schedule, the President’s decision in accordance with the opinion of the Council of Union Ministers shall be final. II. There is no mention of the word ‘political party’ in the Constitution of India. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
Statement 1 is incorrect: Under the Tenth Schedule (anti-defection law), the authority to decide on disqualification due to defection is the Speaker of the House of the People (Lok Sabha), not the President. The Speaker’s decision is final in cases of anti-defection.
Statement 2 is incorrect: The 52nd Amendment, enacted in 1985, added the Tenth Schedule to the Indian Constitution. This amendment introduced the term ‘Political Party’ into the Constitution for the first time.
Additional insight:
The President’s role in disqualification is limited to other grounds under Article 102, and even then, the President must act according to the opinion of the Election Commission, not the Council of Ministers. Article 102 of the Indian Constitution lays down the grounds for disqualification of a person from being chosen as, or for being, a member of either House of Parliament (Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha). The main grounds include:
Holding any office of profit under the Government of India or a State (unless exempted by Parliament). Being of unsound mind, as declared by a competent court. Being an undischarged insolvent. Not being a citizen of India, or voluntarily acquiring citizenship of a foreign state, or acknowledging allegiance to a foreign state. Being disqualified by or under any law made by Parliament.
UPSC 2025Polity · President
Q7. With reference to the Indian polity, consider the following statements: 1. An Ordinance can amend any Central Act. 2. An Ordinance can abridge a Fundamental Right. 3. An Ordinance can come into effect from a back date. Which of the statements given above are correct?
Explanation
Article 123 of the Constitution empowers the President to promulgate ordinances during the recess of Parliament. These ordinances have the same force and effect as an act of Parliament, but are in the nature of temporary laws.
Statement 1 is correct: An ordinance, issued under Article 123 of the Constitution when Parliament is not in session, has the same force and effect as an Act of Parliament. Therefore, it can amend any existing Central Act, just like a regular law passed by Parliament.
Statement 2 is incorrect: Although an ordinance has the force of law, it is subject to constitutional limitations. As per Article 13(2), the State cannot make any law--including an ordinance--that abridges or takes away Fundamental Rights. Any such ordinance would be unconstitutional and liable to be struck down by the judiciary.
Statement 3 is correct: An ordinance can be given retrospective effect, similar to laws passed by the legislature. There is no constitutional bar on making an ordinance effective from a back date, as long as the ordinance explicitly provides for it.
UPSC 2025Polity · Centre-State Relations
Q8. With reference to India, consider the following: 1. The Inter-State Council 2. The National Security Council 3. Zonal Councils How many of the above were established as per the provisions of the Constitution of India?
Explanation
Statement 1 is correct: The Inter-State Council was established under Article 263 of the Constitution of India. This article empowers the President to create a council to inquire into and advise on disputes between states or between the Union and states, and to promote cooperative federalism. The Inter-State Council was constituted in 1990 by a Presidential order based on this constitutional provision.
Statement 2 is incorrect. The National Security Council (NSC) is a non-constitutional body formed in 1998 by an executive decision of the Government of India. It serves as the apex agency to advise the Prime Minister on matters related to national security and strategic interests but has no basis in the Constitution.
Statement 3 is incorrect. The Zonal Councils were created under the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, which is a statutory act passed by Parliament, not a constitutional provision. These councils facilitate cooperation and coordination among states grouped into zones.
UPSC 2025Polity · Governor
Q9. Consider the following statements: 1. The Constitution of India/explicitly mentions that in certain spheres the Governor of a State acts in his/her own discretion. 2. The President of India can, of his/her own, reserve a bill passed by a State Legislature for his/her consideration without it being forwarded by the Governor of the State concerned. Which of the statements given above is/are correct?
Explanation
Statement 1 is correct: Article 163 provides for a council of ministers with the chief minister at the head to aid and advise the governor in the exercise of his functions except the discretionary ones. If any question arises whether a matter falls within the governor’s discretion or not, the decision of the governor is final and the validity of anything done by him cannot be called in question on the ground that he ought or ought not to have acted in his discretion.
Statement 2 is incorrect: When a bill is sent to the governor after it is passed by state legislature, he can: (a) Give his assent to the bill, or (b) Withhold his assent to the bill, or (c) Return the bill (if it is not a money bill) for reconsideration of the state legislature. However, if the bill is passed again by the state legislature with or without amendments, the governor has to give his assent to the bill, or (d) Reserve the bill for the consideration of the president. The President cannot directly receive or reserve a bill passed by a State Legislature In one case such reservation is obligatory, that is, where the bill passed by the state legislature endangers the position of the state high court. In addition, the governor can also reserve the bill if it is of the following nature: (i) Ultra-vires, that is, against the provisions of the Constitution. (ii) Opposed to the Directive Principles of State Policy. (iii) Against the larger interest of the country. (iv) Of grave national importance. (v) Dealing with compulsory acquisition of property under Article the Constitution.
Exam tip:
For S2, For the President to even see the bill, it must be "reserved" by the Governor. Otherwise, the process becomes arbitrary and bypasses the federal structure. The President does not monitor state legislatures or their bill-passing daily. Can the President randomly browse through state bills and say, "Let me reserve this one"? Illogical and institutionally flawed. Hence S2 likely false. S1 was in the news a lot of times during last year.
UPSC 2025Polity · Miscellaneous
Q10. Consider the following pairs:
Provision in the Constitution of India
Stated under
I. Separation of Judiciary from the Executive in the public services of the State
The Directive Principles of the State Policy
II. Valuing and preserving of the rich heritage of our composite culture
The Fundamental Duties
III. Prohibition of employment of children in factories
The Fundamental Rights
How many of the above pairs are correctly matched?
Explanation
Pair 1 is correct: The separation of the judiciary from the executive is mentioned under Article 50 of the Constitution, which is part of the Directive Principles of State Policy. It directs the State to ensure the independence of the judiciary from executive control in public services.
Pair 2 is correct: The duty to value and preserve the rich heritage of our composite culture is included in the Fundamental Duties under Article 51A(f). This reflects the constitutional commitment to cultural preservation.
Pair 3 is correct: The prohibition of employment of children below the age of 14 years in factories is a Fundamental Right under Article 24 in Part III of the Constitution. It safeguards children from exploitation in hazardous environments.
Answer key for these questions
Q
UPSC year
Correct answer
1
2025
(a) Only one
2
2025
(d) I, II and III
3
2025
(a) III only
4
2025
(a) I only
5
2025
(c) I and III only
6
2025
(d) Neither I nor II
7
2025
(c) I and III only
8
2025
(a) Only one
9
2025
(a) I only
10
2025
(c) All the three
Frequently asked questions
How many previous year UPSC questions are there on Polity?
This page covers 13 previous year UPSC Prelims GS Paper-I questions on Polity in the UPSC 2025 Prelims, asked from 1996 to 2025. Each has the correct answer and an explanation.
How should I use previous year UPSC questions for Prelims?
Attempt each question first, then open the answer and read the explanation for every option. Repeat by chapter, and track which statements UPSC reuses across years. Previous year questions show the exam pattern and difficulty level.
Which years are covered for Polity?
Questions on Polity in the UPSC 2025 Prelims are available for 30 years, from 1996 to 2025. Use the Year filter to practise a single paper.