Explanation
“If there are no laws, there is no liberty" is attributed to John Locke. Law and liberty are not opposed; rather, laws protect liberty.
Option (a) is incorrect: If there are more laws, there is less liberty: This implies that law restricts liberty, which is not always the case. Well-structured laws are meant to protect and preserve liberty by ensuring order and justice. For instance, the Right to Information (RTI) Act, 2005 empowers citizens by promoting transparency in governance, thereby strengthening democracy and individual freedom.
Option (b) is correct: Without laws, there would be chaos, and individual liberty would be at risk. Laws provide the framework that allows liberty to exist and be protected. They ensure that people can enjoy their freedoms without infringing on others’ rights. For instance, without laws regulating traffic, there would be chaos on the roads, leading to accidents and endangering lives.
Option (c) is incorrect: If there is liberty, laws have to be made by the people: While it is important for laws to reflect the will of the people, this option is not as broadly applicable. Liberty can exist even when laws are made by representatives or through other legitimate processes.
Option (d) is incorrect: If laws are changed too often, liberty is in danger: Frequent changes in law may cause instability, but it does not inherently endanger liberty. As long as changes are made transparently and for the benefit of society, liberty can be maintained.